首页> 外文学位 >International trade, economic performance and the political economy of protection: Some aspects of the Brazilian experience.
【24h】

International trade, economic performance and the political economy of protection: Some aspects of the Brazilian experience.

机译:国际贸易,经济表现和保护的政治经济学:巴西经验的某些方面。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The empirical evidence presented here seems to suggest a positive relationship between economic growth and "openness" to international trade in the Brazilian experience from the 60's to the 90's. Estimates of total factor productivity growth, incorporating human capital, seemed positively associated with trade variables.; Caution in the interpretation of this result is needed, however, since several caveats apply: (1) the detection of correlation does not solve the question of causality; (2) defining and measuring "openness" is a tricky business; (3) "outward orientation" does not have to mean "laissez faire" (the anti-export bias of import substitution policies seems to have been counterbalanced by activist export promotion schemes in the Brazilian experience); (4) export promotion since the 60's might have been effective because it was preceded by import substitution in the 50's.; An analysis of trade policy in Brazil in the early 90's is provided. It concludes that the structure of nominal and effective protection was maintained virtually unchanged in the period: sectors that were the most protected previously continued to be the most protected ones.; In terms of efficiency, we found some empirical evidence that would tend to support the claim that trade liberalization was associated with increases in industrial productivity across sectors.; From the institutional point of view, we stress the heterogeneity of the actors affected by trade liberalization, and conclude that expressions like "government", "export sector" and "import competing sector" are useful but potentially misleading terms. Rather than monolithic concepts, each of these terms encompasses a variety of different--and sometimes conflicting--interests.; The sustainability and fate of trade liberalization efforts in Brazil depends on domestic and external factors. On the domestic front, a stable macroeconomic environment, an adequate management of the exchange rate, and a sound position in the Balance of Payments are some of the key issues to consider if further trade barriers are not to be imposed. On the external front, the development of regional arrangements such as the MERCOSUL, the implementation of the GATT agreement, the evolution of the World Trade Organization, the insistence of multilateral organizations such as the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank on liberal policies, and the pressures of bilateral trade partners such as the United States, are some of the forces that help shaping trade policy in Brazil.; Finally we provided a model of the political economy of protection, with especial reference to Brazil. Empirical estimation using Brazilian data seems to confirm some of the predictions of the model. Asymmetries in the distribution of gains associated with trade interventions, and transaction costs involved in participation in the political process, are some of the major elements in the endogenous determination of trade policy. In particular, the finding that opaqueness in trade policy can be understood as a politically rational strategy provides a framework to understand the apparent surge in new forms of potentially protectionist measures in Brazil, such as anti-dumping actions. Trade liberalization does not remove the incentives for sectors to seek protection, and resorting to indirect, non-tariff barriers, can undermine the thrust of liberalization efforts.
机译:此处提供的经验证据似乎表明,从60年代到90年代的巴西经验中,经济增长与对国际贸易的“开放”之间存在正相关关系。结合人力资本的全要素生产率增长的估计值似乎与贸易变量正相关。但是,由于需要注意以下几点,因此在解释此结果时需要谨慎:(1)相关性检测不能解决因果关系问题; (2)定义和衡量“开放性”是一项棘手的事情; (3)“外向型”不一定意味着“放任自流”(在巴西经验中,积极的出口促进计划似乎抵消了进口替代政策的反出口偏见); (4)出口促进,因为60年代可能是有效的,因为它先于50年代的进口替代。提供了对90年代初巴西贸易政策的分析。结论是,在此期间,名义保护和有效保护的结构几乎保持不变:以前受保护最大的部门继续是受保护最多的部门。在效率方面,我们发现了一些经验证据,这些证据倾向于支持贸易自由化与跨部门工业生产率提高相关的说法。从制度的角度来看,我们强调了受贸易自由化影响的行为者的异质性,并得出结论,诸如“政府”,“出口部门”和“进口竞争部门”等用语是有用的,但可能会引起误解。这些术语不是整体概念,而是包含各种不同的(有时是相互冲突的)利益。巴西贸易自由化努力的可持续性和命运取决于国内外因素。在国内方面,一个稳定的宏观经济环境,适当的汇率管理以及在国际收支中的稳健地位是一些主要问题,需要考虑是否不加设进一步的贸易壁垒。在外部方面,诸如南方共同市场的区域安排的发展,关贸总协定的执行,世界贸易组织的发展,国际货币基金组织和世界银行等多边组织对自由政策的坚持,以及诸如美国这样的双边贸易伙伴的压力是有助于塑造巴西贸易政策的一些力量。最后,我们提供了保护的政治经济学模型,其中特别提到了巴西。使用巴西数据进行的经验估计似乎证实了该模型的某些预测。与贸易干预有关的收益分配的不对称性,以及参与政治进程所涉及的交易成本,是内在确定贸易政策的主要因素。特别是,将贸易政策的不透明理解为一种政治上合理的战略的发现,为理解巴西采取新形式的潜在贸易保护主义措施(例如反倾销行动)的明显增加提供了框架。贸易自由化并不会消除各部门寻求保护的动机,而诉诸间接的非关税壁垒可能会破坏自由化努力的动力。

著录项

  • 作者

    Carvalho, Marcelo.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.;

  • 授予单位 University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.;
  • 学科 Economics Commerce-Business.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 1995
  • 页码 152 p.
  • 总页数 152
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 贸易经济;
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:49:40

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号