首页> 外文学位 >The intergenerational effect on poverty vulnerability among female-headed families.
【24h】

The intergenerational effect on poverty vulnerability among female-headed families.

机译:女户主家庭对贫困脆弱性的代际影响。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Longitudinal studies indicate a positive correlation between parents' and daughters' economic attainment, suggesting that poverty and welfare use are to some extent an intergenerational process, a vicious cycle. Such correlation implies that family background factors such as parents' socioeconomic status and/or welfare use history may have intergenerational effect on adult daughters' vulnerability to poverty. Two competing arguments, the socialization versus economic deprivation, have been put forth to explain the intergenerational effect on poverty vulnerability among female headed families. However, neither of them is accepted as an exclusive explanation for the issue.; This study develops a conceptual model that includes both explanations to examine the relative importance of two sets of factors in moderating the intergenerational effect on poverty vulnerability. To be specific, this study tests how attitudes (measured by self-esteem scale), human capital (measured on the basis of education), and financial assets (measured on the basis of savings and investments) moderate the effects of parents' socioeconomic status and welfare use on adult daughters' poverty buffer and welfare use. Using data from the National Survey of Families and Households, 846 female headed households, including 293 black and 553 white families, are included in the analyses. Structural equation modeling (SEM) is used to test the hypotheses that embedded in the conceptual model.; Tests of the analyses suggest an intergenerational correlation of poverty vulnerability among female headed families. Lower parents' socioeconomic status is associated with their adult daughters' chances of living in income poverty. Parents' welfare use is also associated with their adult daughters' likelihood of participating in welfare. Through SEM, path analyses show that the revised path models fit the data better than the proposed path models. Such findings include: (1) economic deprivation factors such as human capital (education) and financial assets moderate the intergenerational effect on poverty buffer model and welfare use model; (2) socialization factors such as self esteem attitudes and human capital only moderate the association between parents' socioeconomic status and daughters' chances of living in income poverty, but not the intergenerational welfare use; (3) the effect of education attainment on assets and the effect of parents' welfare use on assets are consistently significant in intergenerational poverty buffer and in intergenerational welfare use; and (4) the dynamics of the revised model act differently by race only in the intergenerational welfare use but not in intergenerational poverty buffer. Implications for theory, methodology, and policy are discussed.
机译:纵向研究表明,父母和女儿的经济成就之间存在正相关关系,这表明贫穷和福利的使用在某种程度上是代际过程,一个恶性循环。这种相关性意味着家庭背景因素,例如父母的社会经济地位和/或福利使用历史,可能对成年女儿的贫困脆弱性具有代际影响。提出了两个相互竞争的论据,即社会化与经济剥夺,以解释代代相传对女户主家庭贫困脆弱性的影响。但是,它们都不作为该问题的排他性解释。这项研究建立了一个概念模型,其中包括两种解释,以检验两组因素在减轻代沟对贫困脆弱性的影响方面的相对重要性。具体而言,本研究测试态度(以自尊量表衡量),人力资本(以教育为基础)和金融资产(以储蓄和投资为基础)如何减轻父母的社会经济地位的影响成年女儿的贫困缓冲和福利使用。使用来自全国家庭和住户调查的数据,分析中包括293个黑人家庭和553个白人家庭的846个女户主家庭。结构方程模型(SEM)用于测试概念模型中嵌入的假设。分析测试表明,女户主家庭中贫困脆弱性的代际关系。下级父母的社会经济地位与成年女儿生活在收入贫困中的机会有关。父母的福利使用也与成年女儿参加福利的可能性有关。通过SEM,路径分析表明,修订后的路径模型比拟议的路径模型更适合数据。这些发现包括:(1)人力资本(教育)和金融资产等经济剥夺因素减轻了代际对贫困缓冲模型和福利使用模型的影响; (2)自尊态度和人力资本等社会化因素仅能缓和父母的社会经济地位与女儿在收入贫困中生活的机会之间的联系,而不能调节代际福利的使用; (3)受教育程度对资产的影响以及父母对福利的使用对资产的影响在代际贫困缓冲和代际福利使用中始终显着; (4)修改后的模型的动力学行为因种族而异,仅在代际福利使用中有所不同,而在代际贫困缓冲中则没有。讨论了对理论,方法论和政策的暗示。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号