首页> 外文学位 >Limitation of liability in international air transport.
【24h】

Limitation of liability in international air transport.

机译:国际航空运输中的责任限制。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The Warsaw Convention for the Unification of Certain Rules Relating to International Carriage by Air was adopted when aviation was in its developing stage. In order to protect this infant industry, the Convention limited the liability of the air carrier in international air transportation to certain specified amounts. As time went by the Warsaw Convention was amended by several instruments. The end result is that there are several instruments to regulate the liability of air carriers engaged in international air transportation and most of these instruments provide only limited recovery to passengers. Often, passengers try to break the limits prescribed by the Convention alleging willful misconduct on the part of the carrier, his servants or agents or by bringing suits against potentially liable third parties like the aircraft manufacturer or by proving that the documents of carriage were faulty. In the mean time, Italy and Japan took matters into their own hands and raised the limits unilaterally. While Italy raised the limits to 100,000 SDR, Japan waived entirely the Warsaw systems limits of liability.; In this thesis, the development of air law till the adoption of the Warsaw Convention and the various amendments carried out to the Convention over the years will be discussed in the first two chapters. The third chapter mainly concentrates on the rationales for ratifying the Guatemala City Protocol through Montreal Protocol No. 3. While arriving at a conclusion as to why the Montreal Protocols have to be ratified for the successful unification of air carriers liability in international air transport, the Italian and Japanese "solutions" will be evaluated and conclude why those solutions are to be rejected outright. (Abstract shortened by UMI.)
机译:航空业处于发展阶段时,通过了《统一国际航空运输某些规则的华沙公约》。为了保护这一婴儿产业,该公约将航空承运人在国际航空运输中的责任限制为某些规定的数额。随着时间的流逝,《华沙公约》已被多项文书修正。最终结果是,有几种手段可以规范从事国际航空运输的航空承运人的责任,而其中大多数手段只能为旅客提供有限的赔偿。乘客经常试图违反公约规定的限制,指称承运人,其仆人或代理人有故意的不当行为,或者通过对可能负有法律责任的第三方(例如飞机制造商)提起诉讼,或者证明运输文件有误。同时,意大利和日本将事务交由他们自己处理,并单方面提出了限制。在意大利将限额提高到100,000特别提款权的同时,日本完全放弃了华沙系统的责任限额。在本文中,将在前两章中讨论直到《华沙公约》获得通过之前航空法的发展以及多年来对该公约进行的各种修订。第三章主要集中于通过第3号蒙特利尔议定书批准《危地马拉城议定书》的理由。虽然得出结论,为什么必须批准《蒙特利尔议定书》才能成功统一国际航空运输中的航空承运人赔偿责任,将评估意大利和日本的“解决方案”,并得出结论,为什么这些解决方案将被彻底拒绝。 (摘要由UMI缩短。)

著录项

  • 作者

    Thachet, John Thomas.;

  • 作者单位

    McGill University (Canada).;

  • 授予单位 McGill University (Canada).;
  • 学科 Law.; Political Science International Law and Relations.; Transportation.
  • 学位 LL.M.
  • 年度 1995
  • 页码 134 p.
  • 总页数 134
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 法律;国际法;综合运输;
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:49:28

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号