首页> 外文学位 >Foundations of Chinese historiography: Literary representation in Zuo zhuan and Guoyu.
【24h】

Foundations of Chinese historiography: Literary representation in Zuo zhuan and Guoyu.

机译:中国史学的基础:左传和国语的文学表现。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This account of the beginnings of Chinese historiography traces the development of materials and habits of Chinese historical writing through the Warring States period and describes the system of representation which resulted.;Chapter One, "Aspects of Literary Form in Early Chinese Writing," shows how this system is built upon techniques already central to the practice of writing during the Western Zhou (ca. 1050-771 B.C.E.); even the very early bronze inscriptions and preserved speeches of the Zhou dynastic founders demonstrate a concern with exchanged speech and with mimetic ideals that appears to survive in later historiography.;Chapter Two, "Orality, Performance, and Canonicity in the Transmission of Speech Texts," shows how mimetic concerns, operating through a practice of speech recitation, accounted for the oral transmission and recomposition of inherited speeches during the Zhou, ultimately providing historiography with the anecdotes and speeches which would make the bulk of its material.;In Chapter Three, "Speech, Theory, and the Order of the World," I analyze the rhetoric of historiographical speeches in detail, assessing their unique logic and outlining the areas of knowledge which are applied to historical phenomena through the medium of speech-making.;Chapter Four, "Narrative and the Limits of Historical Meaning," describes the various basic modes of narrative in the Zuo zhuan and Guoyu and then identifies a hermeneutic dynamic of observation and judgment as the motive force in narratives. The task of historiography both in individual anecdotes and on the macronarratival level is to bring observed events into line with a Confucian-Traditionalist view of the world's truth.;In Chapter Five, "Aesthetics and the Ends of Historiography," I show how speech rhetoric and narrative habit are linked through a fundamental aesthetic conception which enlists pleasure and fear in the preservation (or reconstitution) of an imagined utopian community.;Finally, in Chapter Six, "Historiography and the Rise of Philosophical Writing," I show how historiography's narrative, its rhetoric, and its fundamental aesthetic illuminate the polemical techniques and stances of several Warring States philosophers, including Mengzi, Mozi, and Xunzi.
机译:这种对中国史学史起源的描述追溯了整个战国时期中国历史文学的材料和习惯的发展,并描述了由此产生的代表制。第一章,“早期中国文学的文学形式方面”展示了如何该系统建立在西周时期(大约公元前1050-771年)已经是写作实践的核心技术上;即使是早期的青铜铭文和保存下来的周朝创建者的演讲,也都显示出人们对交换语言和模仿理想的关注,这种理想似乎在后来的史学中仍然存在。第二章,“言语传播中的口述,表现和规范”, “说明了模仿行为是如何通过朗诵练习来解决周传承传言的口头传播和重组,最终为史学提供了轶事和言语的,这些轶事和言语将构成其大部分内容。;在第三章中,我对“语音,理论和世界秩序”进行了详细的分析,对史学演讲的修辞进行了分析,评估了其独特的逻辑,并概述了通过演讲媒介应用于历史现象的知识领域。 “叙事与历史意义的局限”描述了《左传》和《国语》中的各种叙事基本模式, n将观察和判断的诠释动力确定为叙事的动力。在个人轶事和宏观叙事层面上,史学的任务是使观察到的事件与儒家-传统主义者对世界真相的看法保持一致。;在第五章“美学与史学的终结”中,我展示了言语修辞如何叙事习惯和叙事习惯通过基本的审美观联系在一起,这种审美观在想象的乌托邦社区的保存(或重建)中带来了愉悦和恐惧。最后,在第六章“史学与哲学写作的兴起”中,我展示了史学的叙事方式,它的修辞和基本美学阐释了孟子,墨子和X子等战国哲学家的辩证手法和立场。

著录项

  • 作者

    Schaberg, David Copley.;

  • 作者单位

    Harvard University.;

  • 授予单位 Harvard University.;
  • 学科 Asian literature.;Comparative literature.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 1996
  • 页码 919 p.
  • 总页数 919
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:49:15

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号