首页> 外文学位 >Going green in China: An organization theory perspective on pollution prevention in Chinese electroplating factories.
【24h】

Going green in China: An organization theory perspective on pollution prevention in Chinese electroplating factories.

机译:在中国走向绿色:中国电镀工厂预防污染的组织理论观点。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This dissertation explores why Chinese electroplating firms adopt pollution prevention alternatives. The study also investigates why some enterprises practice more pollution prevention than others. A case study methodology is used to analyze pollution prevention practices in state, collective, and township-and-village (TVE) enterprises in Qingdao, China.;The research finds that electroplating factories adopt pollution prevention measures predominantly to increase profits, to meet pollutant discharge standards, and to avoid paying effluent fees. Six key factors explain the degree of pollution prevention in Chinese electroplating firms: (1) leadership commitment, whereby factory directors attach importance and commit resources to pollution prevention; (2) a pollution prevention champion, a person who coordinates and promotes workshop-level pollution prevention activities; (3) pollution prevention goals, which motivate managers to identify alternatives; (4) managers' awareness of pollution prevention as a strategy and recognition of linkages between production and pollution; (5) pollution prevention responsibility systems, which enable directors to implement and enforce pollution prevention requirements; and (6) staff basic knowledge of technical processes and abilities to design and implement pollution prevention alternatives.;Factories with strong leadership commitment, a pollution prevention champion, strong pollution prevention goals, and managers with high pollution prevention awareness, have proactive environmental management strategies. These firms take an aggressive approach to reducing pollution and attain the highest degrees of pollution prevention within each of two groups: state-owned/collectives and TVEs.;A pollution prevention responsibility system consists of regulations, training, monitoring, and rewards and penalties. A responsibility system is important for two reasons: it facilitates the transmission of pollution prevention goals in the enterprise and ensures implementation of pollution prevention alternatives, especially improved management practices. When enterprises establish responsibility systems, higher adoption of pollution prevention alternatives occurs.;Finally, the dissertation finds that TVEs' weaker technical knowledge and capabilities explains their lower degrees of pollution prevention relative to state firms and collectives. In TVEs, even when staff are eager to reduce pollution, they often do not have the technical knowledge or capacity to identify and implement certain pollution prevention alternatives.
机译:本文探讨了为什么中国电镀企业采用污染预防替代方法。该研究还调查了为什么有些企业比其他企业更多地采取了污染预防措施。运用案例研究方法对青岛市国有,集体,乡镇企业的污染预防措施进行了分析。研究发现,电镀厂主要采取污染预防措施以增加利润,满足污染物排放标准。达到排放标准,并避免支付污水处理费。六个关键因素可以解释中国电镀企业的污染预防程度:(1)领导承诺,工厂负责人重视污染保护并投入资源; (2)污染预防冠军,协调和推动车间级污染预防活动的人; (3)预防污染的目标,激励管理者确定替代方案; (4)管理者将污染预防作为一项战略意识,并认识到生产与污染之间的联系; (5)污染预防责任制,使董事能够执行和执行污染预防要求; (6)具备设计和实施污染预防替代方案的技术流程和能力的基本知识。;领导力强,预防污染的冠军,强有力的污染预防目标,以及对污染预防意识高的管理人员,要有积极的环境管理策略。这些公司采取积极的措施来减少污染,并在以下两个类别中达到最高程度的污染预防:国有/集体和乡镇企业。污染预防责任制包括法规,培训,监督以及奖惩措施。责任制很重要,其原因有两个:促进企业预防污染目标的传递,并确保实施预防污染的替代方案,尤其是改善管理实践。当企业建立责任制时,采用更多的污染预防替代方法。最后,论文发现乡镇企业的技术知识和能力较弱,这说明相对于国有企业和集体企业,其污染预防程度较低。在乡镇企业中,即使员工渴望减少污染,他们通常也不具备识别和实施某些污染预防替代方案的技术知识或能力。

著录项

  • 作者

    Warren, Kimberley Anne.;

  • 作者单位

    Stanford University.;

  • 授予单位 Stanford University.;
  • 学科 Engineering Civil.;Engineering Industrial.;Environmental Sciences.;Engineering Environmental.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 1996
  • 页码 383 p.
  • 总页数 383
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:49:13

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号