首页> 外文学位 >A comparison of slow-frequency-hop and direct-sequence spread-spectrum communications over frequency-selective fading channels.
【24h】

A comparison of slow-frequency-hop and direct-sequence spread-spectrum communications over frequency-selective fading channels.

机译:频率选择性衰落信道上慢跳频和直接序列扩频通信的比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Spread-spectrum modulation can provide protection from the selective fading that is typically encountered in mobile radio networks. Because the methods of combating frequency-selective fading are quite different for slow-frequency-hop (SFH) and direct-sequence (DS) spread spectrum systems, these two types of modulation behave very differently. The purpose of this dissertation is to compare the performance of SFH and DS systems under identical conditions for several models of the wideband fading channel. Each system has the same bandwidth, transmits over the same frequency-selective Gaussian wide-sense-stationary uncorrelated-scattering channel, and uses error-correction coding to combat thermal noise and fading. The probability of bit error at the output of the decoder is determined for each system by a combination of analysis and simulation. Results are presented for systems with a single transmitter-receiver pair and for networks with multiple simultaneous transmissions (i.e., multiple-access communications). The multiple-access network is distributed, so that control of power by a central terminal, such as a base station, is not possible. These results illustrate the tradeoffs in performance between the two types of spread-spectrum systems as a function of the parameters of the spread-spectrum signals and the frequency-selective fading channel. The performance of the SFH system is shown to be less sensitive to the exact characterization of the channel delay spectrum than the DS system. For most of the channels considered in this dissertation, slow frequency hopping gives better performance than DS.
机译:扩频调制可以提供保护,使其免受移动无线电网络中常见的选择性衰落的影响。由于在慢频跳频(SFH)和直接序列(DS)扩频系统中,对抗频率选择衰落的方法大不相同,因此这两种调制方式的行为截然不同。本文的目的是针对几种衰落信道模型在相同条件下比较SFH和DS系统的性能。每个系统具有相同的带宽,在相同的频率选择高斯广义静止平稳不相关散射信道上传输,并使用纠错编码来抵抗热噪声和衰落。通过分析和仿真的组合,为每个系统确定解码器输出端出现误码的可能性。给出了具有单个发射机-接收机对的系统以及具有多个同时传输(即,多址通信)的网络的结果。多址网络是分布式的,因此不可能通过中央终端(例如基站)控制电源。这些结果说明了两种类型的扩频系统之间的性能折衷,取决于扩频信号和频率选择性衰落信道的参数。与DS系统相比,SFH系统的性能对信道延迟频谱的精确表征不那么敏感。对于本文所考虑的大多数信道,慢跳频的性能要优于DS。

著录项

  • 作者

    Gass, John Henry, Jr.;

  • 作者单位

    Clemson University.;

  • 授予单位 Clemson University.;
  • 学科 Engineering Electronics and Electrical.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 1996
  • 页码 68 p.
  • 总页数 68
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 无线电电子学、电信技术;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号