首页> 外文学位 >Accessibility to long-term care: A comparison of Fredericton, New Brunswick, Canada and Clark County, Nevada.
【24h】

Accessibility to long-term care: A comparison of Fredericton, New Brunswick, Canada and Clark County, Nevada.

机译:长期护理的可及性:加拿大新不伦瑞克省弗雷德里克顿和内华达州克拉克县的比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

There has been extensive debate in this country on the ability of the health care system to adequately distribute Long Term Care (LTC) to the elderly. Three perspectives have emerged to explain current problems in access to LTC by the elderly indigent: The Market Model Perspective, Weber's Bureaucratic Perspective, and the Neo-Marxist Perspective. This study will assess these three theories, by examining constraints to accessibility within two systems, Canada and the United States. The LTC delivery service systems of the Fredericton region of New Brunswick and Clark County, Nevada, were examined in the summer and fall of 1992, to ascertain impediments to access as identified by service providers.; The research also analyzes the Fredericton region, before and after their enactment of the Single-Entry Point System for LTC. The research is composed of three components: (1) Historical Perspective, (2) Interviews with LTC providers and, (3) Content analysis. Of the three perspectives, the Neo-Marxist Perspective was found to best explain identifiable constraints among the two countries.
机译:在该国,关于医疗保健系统向老年人充分分配长期护理(LTC)的能力存在广泛的争论。出现了三种观点来解释老年人在获取LTC方面的当前问题:市场模型观点,韦伯的官僚观点和新马克思主义观点。本研究将通过检查加拿大和美国这两个系统内对可访问性的限制,来评估这三个理论。 1992年夏季和秋季对新不伦瑞克省弗雷德里克顿地区和内华达州克拉克县的LTC交付服务系统进行了检查,以确定服务提供者所确定的获取障碍。该研究还分析了弗雷德里克顿地区在制定LTC单点系统之前和之后的情况。该研究由三个部分组成:(1)历史观点;(2)与LTC提供者的访谈;(3)内容分析。在这三个观点中,发现了新马克思主义观点可以最好地解释两国之间可确定的制约因素。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号