首页> 外文学位 >Brown versus the Board of Education, a historical analysis of Brown I, Brown II and Brown III.
【24h】

Brown versus the Board of Education, a historical analysis of Brown I, Brown II and Brown III.

机译:布朗与教育委员会的比较,对布朗一世,布朗二世和布朗三世的历史分析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

May 17, 1954, was perhaps the most controversial day in the United States educational system. On this day, the United States Supreme Court rendered a monumental decision that would have an impact on the structure of all schools in this country. In time, its impact would extend to areas far beyond the scope of American education. Our public school structure, had traditionally been a conservatively evolving entity; it was totally rocked to the core of its foundation, with the United States Supreme Court rulings in the School Segregation Cases. This foundational shift in American education occurred with the United States Supreme Court rulings in Brown v. Board of Education, 347 U.S. 483.; The United States Supreme Court rulings in the Brown cases of 1954 and 1955 negated a previous United States Supreme Court ruling in Plessy v. Ferguson (1896). The court overturned the "separate but equal doctrine" that had been established by Plessy and further stated that "separate but equal was inherently unequal." This new view was a significant change in the way education had been viewed for almost three quarters of a century.; The Brown rulings tremendously affected the way minorities would be educated in the schools of America. This had a direct impact on the education of African-American (Negro) school age children. African-Americans were the plaintiffs in the Brown cases. Brown's impact was beneficial to other minority groups as well.; African-Americans have gone through the emotional gamete relative to their education or lack of education in this country's schools. There was a period in America's history when it was illegal for African-Americans to be taught how to read or write. There was another period in our country's history when education was made available, after the abolition of slavery, but the proper raw materials necessary to accomplish the task adequately were scarce. The later, was a contributing factor to the Brown litigations of the 1950s.; Unfortunately, the Brown I (1954) ruling and the Brown II (1955) implementation decree did not put an end to the segregated schools in many of America's school systems. Over the next twenty years many school systems struggled with the mandates of Brown. Topeka, Kansas, one of the cities involved in the original Brown litigation would have its own unique set of problems relative to desegregation. In time, a group of parents would have the Brown case reopened. Brown III, (1986) questioned many facets of minority students' education in Topeka U.S. D. #501.; This historical research analysis will seek to explore the dynamics involved in Brown I, II, and III. Educational opportunities for Topeka's African-Americans will be explored to analyze contemporary conditions that led to Brown III. Primary sources and secondary sources will be analyzed to investigate circumstances that affected the various Brown litigations. Implications related to issues of race and schools will be explored in hopes of drawing conclusions that may positively impact education today and in the future for all of our nations' children.
机译:1954年5月17日,可能是美国教育系统中最具争议的一天。在这一天,美国最高法院做出了一项具有里程碑意义的决定,该决定将对该国所有学校的结构产生影响。随着时间的推移,其影响将扩展到远远超出美国教育范围的领域。传统上,我们的公立学校结构是一个保守发展的实体;在美国最高法院关于学校隔离案的裁决中,它完全被打碎了它的基础。美国教育的这一根本转变发生在美国最高法院在《布朗诉教育委员会案》(347 U.S. 483)中的裁决中。美国最高法院在1954年和1955年的布朗案中的裁决否定了美国最高法院先前在Plessy诉Ferguson诉(1896)中的裁决。法院推翻了普莱西确立的“分开但平等的原则”,并进一步指出“分开但平等本质上是不平等的”。这种新观点是对近四分之三世纪以来人们对教育的看法的重大改变。布朗的裁决极大地影响了美国学校对少数民族的教育方式。这直接影响了非裔美国人(黑人)学龄儿童的教育。非裔美国人是布朗案的原告。布朗的影响也有益于其他少数群体。非裔美国人经历了与他们受教育程度或该国学校缺乏教育有关的情感游戏。在美国历史上曾有一段时期,教导非洲裔美国人如何读写是违法的。废除奴隶制后,在我国历史上还有一个时期可以提供教育,但缺乏足够的原材料来充分完成这项任务。后来,这是1950年代布朗诉讼的一个促成因素。不幸的是,布朗一世(1954)的裁决和布朗二世(1955)的执行令并未终结美国许多学校系统中的隔离学校。在接下来的20年中,许多学校系统都在为布朗的职责而苦苦挣扎。堪萨斯州托皮卡(Topeka)是参与原始布朗诉讼的城市之一,在消除种族隔离方面将有其独特的问题。随着时间的推移,一群父母将重新审理布朗案。布朗三世(Brown III,1986)对美国Topeka 501号少数民族学生的教育提出了许多质疑。这项历史研究分析将寻求探索涉及布朗一,二和三的动力。将探索托皮卡非裔美国人的教育机会,以分析导致布朗三世的当代情况。将对主要来源和次要来源进行分析,以调查影响各种布朗诉讼的情况。我们将探讨与种族和学校问题有关的含义,以期得出结论,这些结论可能对当今和将来对我们所有国家的孩子的教育产生积极影响。

著录项

  • 作者

    Burrell, Lisa A.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Houston.;

  • 授予单位 University of Houston.;
  • 学科 Education History of.; Education Bilingual and Multicultural.; Education Elementary.
  • 学位 Ed.D.
  • 年度 1996
  • 页码 469 p.
  • 总页数 469
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 教育;初等教育;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号