首页> 外文学位 >1951 Agreement between the Red Cross and St. John Ambulance: A case study of the effect of civil defense on Canada's health care system.
【24h】

1951 Agreement between the Red Cross and St. John Ambulance: A case study of the effect of civil defense on Canada's health care system.

机译:1951年《红十字与圣约翰救护车协定》:以民防对加拿大医疗体系的影响为例。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Until 1951 St. John Ambulance and the Red Cross were traditional rivals in Canada, but in that year the two organizations signed an agreement rationalizing their roles in the Canadian Health and Welfare State of the post-war period. Each organization gave up part of its operations in order to achieve this agreement. The Red Cross traded the right to run first aid courses in favour of exclusive rights to type, collect and distribute blood (and eventually blood products) in Canada. St. John Ambulance ceased to operate its blood grouping clinics in exchange for assurances that the Red Cross would stay out of the field of industrial first aid.;The broker of this agreement was the Federal Government. Ottawa was concerned with introducing the Canadian population to the medical miracle of blood transfusion. It also wanted a rationalized first aid training system. Additionally, the Federal Government wanted to do both things with little cost and without stepping on provincial toes. The facilitating opportunity was provided by the Cold War and the needs of Civil Defence.;In some measure, this intervention into a major health area can be seen as a happy accident. To paraphrase Armstrong and Nelles, determinism is more evident in hindsight. The 1951 agreement occurred in a set of circumstances that allowed all three parties to view as valuable the concessions necessary to achieve the agreement.
机译:直到1951年,圣约翰救护车和红十字会一直是加拿大的传统竞争对手,但是在那一年,这两个组织签署了一项协议,合理化了他们在战后时期加拿大健康与福利州中的角色。每个组织都放弃了部分业务以达成此协议。红十字会交换了开办急救课程的权利,转而拥有在加拿大打字,收集和分发血液(最终是血液制品)的专有权利。圣约翰救护车公司停止了其血型诊所的运营,以换取保证红十字会不会进入工业急救领域的行动。该协议的中介者是联邦政府。渥太华担心将加拿大人口介绍给输血的医学奇迹。它还希望有一个合理的急救培训系统。此外,联邦政府希望既能做到既省钱又省事。冷战和民防的需要提供了便利机会。在某种程度上,对主要卫生领域的干预可以看作是一次不幸的事故。用阿姆斯特朗和内莱斯来解释,确定性在事后看来更为明显。 1951年的协议发生在一系列情况下,使所有三个方面都可以将达成该协议所需的让步视为有价值的。

著录项

  • 作者

    Toxopeus, Deanna.;

  • 作者单位

    Carleton University (Canada).;

  • 授予单位 Carleton University (Canada).;
  • 学科 History Canadian.;Health Sciences Health Care Management.
  • 学位 M.A.
  • 年度 1997
  • 页码 100 p.
  • 总页数 100
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:49:06

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号