首页> 外文学位 >Worst-case evaluation methods for vehicles and vehicle control systems.
【24h】

Worst-case evaluation methods for vehicles and vehicle control systems.

机译:车辆和车辆控制系统的最坏情况评估方法。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Worst-case evaluation methods are developed for the evaluation of dynamic systems in this dissertation. The objective of these methods is to systematically identify worst-case disturbances so that the performance of dynamic systems under extreme conditions can be evaluated. The generation of the worst-case disturbances is an optimization problem in a differential game framework. Depending on the number of players and the information structure, the worst-case evaluation problems can be classified into four types: one-player without preview information (1P), one-player with preview information (1PP), two-player without preview information (2P), and two-player with preview information (2PP). Classical optimal control and zero-sum two-player game theory are used to construct the worst-case disturbances.; In general, the solution to a two-point boundary-value problem (TPBVP) is required for worst-case problems. When the system is linear, analytical solutions for the TPBVP can be obtained. For nonlinear systems, the worst-case problems need to be solved by numerically. Both analytical solutions and numerical methods are presented. The analytical solution of 2PP problems was derived, and is a key contribution of this dissertation.; Two case studies on vehicle dynamic/control systems are presented to illustrate the procedures of the worst-case disturbance generation. The first case study is on the rollover and jackknifing of articulated trucks, which is formulated as a 1P problem. The second case study involves a vehicle dynamics control (VDC) system, whose worst-case disturbances are obtained by formulating a 2PP problem. In both case studies, the worst-case methods find the weakness of the target systems and result in instabilities. The identified worst-case disturbances do not exhibit features that can be easily constructed and explained by engineering intuition, which clearly shows the merits of the proposed methods.
机译:本文针对动态系统的评估,提出了最坏情况的评估方法。这些方法的目的是系统地识别最坏情况的干扰,以便评估极端条件下动态系统的性能。在差分博弈框架中,最坏情况的干扰的产生是一个优化问题。根据玩家的数量和信息结构,最坏情况下的评估问题可以分为四种类型:没有预览信息的一人(1P),有预览信息的一人(1PP),没有预览信息的两人(2P),以及具有预览信息的两人游戏(2PP)。经典的最优控制和零和两人博弈理论被用来构造最坏情况的干扰。通常,最坏情况的问题需要解决两点边值问题(TPBVP)。当系统为线性时,可以获得TPBVP的解析解。对于非线性系统,最坏情况的问题需要通过数值求解。提出了解析解和数值方法。得出了2PP问题的解析解,是本文的重要贡献。提出了两个关于车辆动态/控制系统的案例研究,以说明最坏情况下的干扰产生过程。第一个案例研究是铰接式卡车的翻车和顶升,这被认为是一个1P问题。第二个案例研究涉及车辆动态控制(VDC)系统,其最坏情况的干扰是通过公式2PP问题获得的。在这两个案例研究中,最坏情况的方法都会发现目标系统的弱点并导致不稳定。所识别的最坏情况干扰不具有可以通过工程直觉轻松构建和解释的特征,这清楚地表明了所提出方法的优点。

著录项

  • 作者

    Ma, Wen-Hou.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Michigan.;

  • 授予单位 University of Michigan.;
  • 学科 Engineering Mechanical.; Engineering Automotive.; Transportation.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 1998
  • 页码 133 p.
  • 总页数 133
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 机械、仪表工业;自动化技术及设备;综合运输;
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:48:45

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号