首页> 外文学位 >Evaluation of recycling and reuse of building materials using the emergy analysis method.
【24h】

Evaluation of recycling and reuse of building materials using the emergy analysis method.

机译:使用能值分析方法评估建筑材料的回收和再利用。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

In this dissertation, regarding the costs and benefits of recycling building materials, the main question was: what are appropriate measures or indices to judge recycle benefits? To answer this question, techniques of emergy analysis were used to evaluate inputs to the production processes of six major building materials and several other secondary materials as well as the inputs to recycle systems for these products in three different recycle trajectories. Emergy is the amount of energy required to make something expressed in units of the same form of energy. The emergy in building materials and recycle systems was expressed as solar energy.; The emergy per mass for building materials vaned from a low of 0.88 E9 sej/g for wood to a high of 1.27 E10 sej/g for aluminum. Generally, emergy per mass is a good indicator of recycle-ability, where materials with high emergy per mass are more recyclable. Recycling added between 1% (concrete) and 568% (wood) to the emergy inputs per gram of building materials. The analysis of materials suggested that recycle of wood may not be advantageous on a large scale, but metals, plastic, and glass have very positive benefits.; Two types of solid waste disposal systems were evaluated: municipal solid wastes (MSW), and construction and demolition (C&D) wastes. Expressed as emergy, the costs of collecting and landfilling (for 50 years) MSW were 264.4 E6 sej/g while sorting recycled materials was evaluated as 8.2 E6 sej/g. The costs of demolition, collection and landfilling C&D wastes were 83.4 E6 sej/g and sorting costs were 6.7 E6 sej/g.; Several different recycle trajectories were identified and analyzed: (1) material recycle, (2) byproduct use, and (3) adaptive reuse. Four recycle indices measuring the benefits of various recycle systems suggested that materials that have large refining costs have greatest potential for high recycle benefits. Aluminum had the highest benefit of about 49.9 where expression as emergy required for emergy cost of recycle. Highest benefits appear to accrue from material recycle systems (ranging from 0.05 to 49.9), followed by adaptive reuse systems (3.3 to 32) and then by byproduct reuse systems (2.4 to 9.2).
机译:在本文中,关于回收建筑材料的成本和收益,主要问题是:判断回收收益的适当措施或指标是什么?为了回答这个问题,使用能值分析技术来评估六种主要建筑材料和其他几种辅助材料的生产过程的输入,以及这些产品在三种不同的回收轨迹中的回收系统的投入。能值是指以某种形式的能量表达某种东西所需的能量。建筑材料和回收系统中的能值以太阳能表示。建筑材料的单位质量能值从木材的0.88 E9 sej / g的最低值变为铝的1.27 E10 sej / g的最高值。通常,单位质量能值是可回收性的良好指标,单位质量能值高的材料具有更高的可回收性。每克建筑材料的能效投入增加了1%(混凝土)至568%(木材)的回收量。材料分析表明,木材的大规模回收可能不利,但是金属,塑料和玻璃具有非常积极的好处。评估了两种类型的固体废物处理系统:城市固体废物(MSW)和建筑与拆除(C&D)废物。以能值表示,收集和掩埋(50年)城市固体废弃物的成本为264.4 E6 sej / g,而对回收材料的分类评估为8.2 E6 sej / g。拆建,收集和掩埋拆建废物的成本为83.4 E6 sej / g,分类成本为6.7 E6 sej / g。确定并分析了几种不同的回收轨迹:(1)材料回收,(2)副产品使用和(3)适应性再利用。四个衡量各种回收系统效益的回收指数表明,精炼成本高的材料具有最大的回收效益。铝具有约49.9的最高收益,其中表达为能值是回收能值所需的。物料回收系统(范围从0.05到49.9),再到适应性再利用系统(3.3到32),再到副产品再利用系统(2.4到9.2),似乎可以带来最高的收益。

著录项

  • 作者

    Buranakarn, Vorasun.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Florida.;

  • 授予单位 University of Florida.;
  • 学科 Architecture.; Environmental Sciences.; Business Administration General.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 1998
  • 页码 260 p.
  • 总页数 260
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 建筑科学;环境科学基础理论;贸易经济;
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:48:48

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号