首页> 外文学位 >Organizational support systems for team-based organizations: Employee collaboration through organizational structures.
【24h】

Organizational support systems for team-based organizations: Employee collaboration through organizational structures.

机译:基于团队的组织的组织支持系统:通过组织结构的员工协作。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The purpose of this study was to examine relationships between organizational support and Effectiveness, Empowerment, and team characteristics. Support was operationalized by nine systems: Executive Management, Direct Supervision, Group Design, Performance Definition, Performance Review, Training, Rewards, Information, and Integration. Support was rated in two ways: how important is support for performing work (Importance scales), and how does support describe work environments (Presence scales).; Correlations indicate low relationships between Importance and Effectiveness. A low relationship was found between important executive management behaviors and effectiveness. High correlations between Importance scales suggest that alignment between systems is an important component of supportive organizational contexts.; Importance and Presence scale comparisons suggest that organizations are providing less organizational support than ideal. Group Design and Defining Performance had the highest means for both Importance and Presence scales. Employees were least satisfied with Rewards and Executive Management support. Organizations may have the most difficulty implementing these systems.; Organizational support was directly related to perceived Empowerment and Effectiveness. To "empower" employees and increase effectiveness, organizations might implement supports studied in this research. Empowerment might be defined by organizational support. Highly empowered groups appear to require specific organizational supports.; Effectiveness analyses suggest that organizational contexts emphasize Customer Satisfaction and Resource Utilization and Development. This may decrease available support for Psychological Effectiveness and Team Effectiveness. Organizations might balance planned outcomes by meeting subtle and obvious types of Effectiveness. Further, the Group Design and Defining Performance scales best predict Effectiveness. Different organizational supports may be needed to reinforce different types of Effectiveness.; No differences were found between Importance scales as a function of team or nonteam membership. Systems measured by the Support Systems Survey may reflect important components of organizational contexts, even if organizations do not utilize teams. Support differences were found for distinct supervisor styles and different team durations. No support differences were found for different team tasks or single- or multi-functional teams. Suggestions for future research are provided.
机译:这项研究的目的是检查组织支持与有效性,授权和团队特征之间的关系。支持由以下9个系统实现:执行管理,直接监督,团队设计,绩效定义,绩效审查,培训,奖励,信息和集成。对支持的评分有两种方式:对执行工作的支持有多重要(重要性量表),以及支持如何描述工作环境(现状量表)。相关性表明重要性和有效性之间的关系较低。发现重要的执行管理行为与有效性之间的关系很低。重要性量表之间的高度相关性表明,系统之间的一致性是支持性组织环境的重要组成部分。重要性和状态量表的比较表明,组织提供的组织支持少于理想的组织。团队设计和绩效定义对于重要性和在场感量表具有最高的手段。员工对奖励和执行管理的支持最不满意。组织可能最难以实施这些系统。组织支持与授权和有效性直接相关。为了“赋权”员工并提高效率,组织可以实施本研究中研究的支持。授权可以由组织支持来定义。权能较高的团体似乎需要特定的组织支持。有效性分析表明,组织环境强调客户满意度和资源利用与开发。这可能会减少对心理有效性和团队有效性的支持。组织可以通过达到微妙和明显的有效性类型来平衡计划的结果。此外,小组设计和绩效定义量表可以最好地预测有效性。可能需要不同的组织支持以增强不同类型的有效性。重要性量表之间没有发现团队或非团队成员关系的差异。即使组织不利用团队,由“支持系统调查”衡量的系统也可能反映了组织环境的重要组成部分。对于不同的主管风格和不同的团队持续时间,发现了支持差异。对于不同的团队任务或单功能或多功能团队,没有发现支持差异。提供了未来研究的建议。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号