首页> 外文学位 >Consistency of assigned class numbers derived from the Library of Congress classification scheme in university libraries: Issues of collocation and implications for information retrieval in online union catalogs.
【24h】

Consistency of assigned class numbers derived from the Library of Congress classification scheme in university libraries: Issues of collocation and implications for information retrieval in online union catalogs.

机译:从大学图书馆的国会图书馆分类方案得出的指定班级编号的一致性:配置问题和在线联合目录中信息检索的含义。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The level of consistency in the assignment of LCC based class numbers within and across library systems was studied and where variations existed they were examined to determine the reasons for them. A Direct Study of class numbers assigned to a representative sample of 200 titles and their available editions in 52 American library systems was conducted. Also, a questionnaire survey to clarify library classification policies and classification decisions made by catalogers from the library sample based on a week's work was conducted.; The Direct Study showed that under the condition that a library system has a title, the probability of its having the same class number across library systems is (1) greater than 0.85, (2) greater if the title belongs to the sciences than if it belongs to the humanities, which in turn is greater than if it belongs to the social sciences, (3) greater if it is published between 1978-1995, as compared to the period 1972-77, which in turn is greater than if it is published during the period 1911-1971. An examination of titles displaying variation in class numbers among library systems showed that certain titles for example, titles in series, bibliographies and fiction, lend themselves to alternate class numbers. Also it was found that the probability that a title and its available editions will have the same class number across and within the library systems is greater than 0.5. For one-third of the titles displaying non-matches among editions, different class numbers were assigned for different editions by a majority of library systems.; Results of the survey showed that the most frequently cited reason for assigning an original class number for a title is the non-availability of cataloging copy for that title. The Library of Congress supplied record is the most favored copy; libraries tend to accept LC-assigned class numbers without checking them, except in three cases. The assignment of class numbers for three types of titles--titles in series, fiction (PZ vs. PR, PS) and bibliographies--is often guided by internal library policy. There is no uniform policy relating to collocation of editions among those libraries who responded. The tendency seems to be toward assigning class numbers from the copy cataloging record for a recent edition, even if this separates it from its earlier editions.
机译:研究了图书馆系统内部和整个图书馆系统中基于LCC的班级编号分配的一致性程度,并检查了存在差异的地方以确定出现这些差异的原因。对分配给52个美国图书馆系统中200个标题的代表性样本及其可用版本的班级编号进行了直接研究。此外,还进行了问卷调查,以澄清图书馆分类政策和编目人员根据一周的工作从图书馆样本中得出的分类决定。直接研究表明,在图书馆系统具有标题的条件下,在整个图书馆系统中拥有相同类别编号的概率是(1)大于0.85,(2)如果该标题属于科学,则其可能性大于如果该科学属于标题(3)如果在1978-1995年之间出版,则比在1972-77年时期更大;而如果在1978-1995年之间出版,则比在社会科学领域要大。在1911年至1971年期间出版。对显示图书馆系统中班级编号变化的标题的检查表明,某些标题(例如,系列标题,参考书目和小说)可以采用其他分类编号。此外,还发现标题及其可用版本在整个图书馆系统内和图书馆系统内具有相同类别编号的可能性大于0.5。对于三分之一版本之间显示不匹配的标题,大多数图书馆系统为不同版本分配了不同的类别编号。调查结果表明,为标题分配原始类别编号的最经常引用的原因是该标题的目录副本不可用。国会图书馆提供的记录是最受欢迎的副本;图书馆倾向于接受LC分配的类编号而不检查它们,除非在三种情况下。三种标题的类别编号的分配-系列标题,小说(PZ与PR,PS)和参考书目-通常受内部图书馆政策的指导。在响应的图书馆之间,没有统一的政策来协调版本。趋势似乎是从副本目录记录中为最新版本分配类别编号,即使这将其与早期版本分开了。

著录项

  • 作者

    Subrahmanyam, Bhagirathi.;

  • 作者单位

    University of California, Los Angeles.;

  • 授予单位 University of California, Los Angeles.;
  • 学科 Library Science.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 1998
  • 页码 185 p.
  • 总页数 185
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 图书馆学、图书馆事业;
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:48:43

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号