首页> 外文学位 >Marxism and the critique of moral ideology.
【24h】

Marxism and the critique of moral ideology.

机译:马克思主义与道德意识形态批判。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Marxists often make claims about the content, causes, and social functions of ideologies. Perhaps the most iconoclastic of these is the thesis that mortality is ideological (what I call "the moral ideology thesis"). But given certain other commitments of Marxism, it is difficult to make sense of this thesis, let alone assess its truth. For while clearly the moral ideology thesis is meant as a severe criticism of morality, one that seems to preclude Marxism from consistently offering a moral critique of class societies, Marxists seem to be employing a form of moral critique when they claim that class societies are exploitative. This is, of course, one version of the familiar "paradox" of Marxism's attitude toward morality.; There are roughly three ways to dissolve this "paradox" within Marxism: (i) Reject, or weaken, the moral ideology thesis so that Marxism can consistently offer a moral critique of class-structured societies; (ii) accept the moral ideology thesis and treat Marxism as a non-evaluative "science," rejecting the critical enterprise of Marxism altogether; or (iii) accept the moral ideology thesis, along with its implication that the moral critique of class societies is incompatible with certain basic commitments of Marxism, but show that this does not undermine the Marxist critical project. In this dissertation, I defend the moral ideology thesis in accordance with strategy (iii).; I argue that ideologies are illusory forms of social consciousness that function to stabilized relations of domination and exploitation and that tend to be accepted by agents because of the unconscious influence of their class interests or class position on their beliefs. I defend the moral ideology thesis by showing that morality exhibits these ideological characteristics. To resolve the tension between the moral ideology thesis, the thesis that class societies are exploitative, and the Marxist critique of class society, I explain how the Marxist theory of exploitation forms the basis of a nonmoral critique of class societies. And I argue that the critique of moral ideology in fact supports, rather than undermines, the thesis that class societies are exploitative.
机译:马克思主义者经常声称意识形态的内容,原因和社会功能。其中最破例的论点是死亡率是意识形态的论点(我称之为“道德意识形态论题”)。但是,鉴于马克思主义的其他某些承诺,很难理解这一论点,更不用说评估其真实性了。因为虽然道德意识形态论题显然是对道德的严厉批评,似乎阻止了马克思主义始终如一地对阶级社会进行道德批判,但当马克思主义者声称阶级社会是剥削性的时,他们似乎正在采用一种道德批评形式。 。当然,这是马克思主义对道德态度的熟悉的“悖论”的一种形式。在马克思主义中,有大约三种方法可以消除这种“悖论”:(i)拒绝或削弱道德意识形态论题,以便马克思主义能够始终如一地对阶级结构社会提出道德批判; (ii)接受道德意识形态论题,并将马克思主义视为一种非评价性的“科学”,完全否定了马克思主义的批判精神;或(iii)接受道德意识形态论题,并暗示其对阶级社会的道德批判与马克思主义的某些基本承诺不相容,但表明这并不破坏马克思主义的批判计划。在本文中,我按照策略(iii)捍卫了道德意识形态论题。我认为,意识形态是社会意识的虚幻形式,可起到稳定统治和剥削关系的作用,并且由于其阶级利益或阶级地位对其信仰的无意识影响而倾向于被代理人接受。我通过证明道德具有这些意识形态特征来捍卫道德思想论题。为了解决道德意识形态论,阶级社会是剥削性的论点与马克思主义阶级社会的批判之间的矛盾,我解释了马克思主义的剥削理论如何构成阶级社会的非道德批判的基础。我认为,对道德意识形态的批评实际上支持而不是破坏了阶级社会是剥削性的论点。

著录项

  • 作者

    Shelby, Tommie.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Pittsburgh.;

  • 授予单位 University of Pittsburgh.;
  • 学科 Philosophy.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 1998
  • 页码 194 p.
  • 总页数 194
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 哲学理论;
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:48:30

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号