首页> 外文学位 >An outcome analysis of a divorce mediation program.
【24h】

An outcome analysis of a divorce mediation program.

机译:离婚调解程序的结果分析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Since the times of Solomon, divorce and custody proceedings have proven to be both personal as well as governmental matters of concern and jurisdiction. Throughout western history, the family, its sanctity, dissolution and distribution of property (including children) have been matters of both legislative and judicial concern. Progressively, responsibility for family dissolution has moved extensively outward from the family and community of neighbors as well as religious peers, to the formality of today's judicial system.; However, little research was conducted until the contemporary era regarding the personal and psychological, as well as social costs of divorce on the parties to the proceedings---particularly the children themselves. It was not until the 1970's that the first No-Fault divorce laws became effective throughout the United States. It was not until the past twenty years that a national system of Family Courts were established to deal exclusively with domestic concerns. While psychology has followed the impact of changes in domestic relations to the parties involved, the role of psychology in assessing and evaluating the legislative/judicial efficacy and impact on the parties have not kept pace with regulatory change.; This study proposed to evaluate two key years in a court system's operation, 1995 (baseline year) and 1996 (a year in which a series of legislative and judicial reforms were initiated to enhance court proceedings).; Overall, the biodemographic characteristics of divorcing parties has remained stable as a profile, while regulatory changes increased cost and time to complete proceedings for some categories of parties and reduced them for others. Formerly stable findings across parties (mediated, non-mediated, litigated) have begun to change in response to regulatory initiatives but the findings have yet to be stabilized. Longer terms of outcome study, and changes in the type, nature and accessibility of court data are recommended in order to provide an empirical database which can better inform recommendations for effective, efficacious and psychologically sound improvements to a system, which heretofore, did not address the psychic needs of the participants.
机译:自所罗门时代以来,离婚和监护程序已被证明既是个人事务,也是政府关心和管辖的事务。在整个西方历史上,家庭,家庭的神圣性,财产(包括儿童)的消散和分配一直是立法和司法关注的问题。逐渐地,家庭解散的责任已从邻居的家庭和社区以及宗教同伴广泛地移到了今天的司法系统的形式上。但是,直到当代,有关诉讼当事人,特别是孩子本人的个人和心理以及离婚的社会成本的研究很少。直到1970年代,第一部无过错离婚法才在整个美国生效。直到过去二十年,才建立了专门处理家庭问题的全国家庭法院体系。尽管心理学受到了家庭关系变化对有关当事方的影响,但心理学在评估和评估立法/司法效力以及对当事方的影响方面的作用却未能与法规的变化保持同步。这项研究建议评估法院系统运作的两个关键年份,即1995年(基准年)和1996年(这一年中,开始了一系列立法和司法改革以加强法院诉讼程序)。总体而言,离婚各方的生物人口统计学特征总体上保持稳定,而法规变更增加了完成某些类别的当事人诉讼的成本和时间,而减少了其他类别的当事人的诉讼。各方(调解,非调解,诉讼)以前稳定的调查结果已开始响应监管计划而发生变化,但调查结果尚未稳定。建议提供长期的结果研究,并改变法院数据的类型,性质和可访问性,以便提供一个经验数据库,该数据库可以更好地为对系统进行有效,有效和心理上合理的改进提供建议,而迄今为止,该系统尚未解决。参与者的心理需求。

著录项

  • 作者

    Bogolub, Charlene Sharp.;

  • 作者单位

    Miami Institute of Psychology of the Caribbean Center for Advanced Studies.;

  • 授予单位 Miami Institute of Psychology of the Caribbean Center for Advanced Studies.;
  • 学科 Psychology Social.; Sociology Individual and Family Studies.
  • 学位 Psy.D.
  • 年度 1998
  • 页码 146 p.
  • 总页数 146
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 社会心理、社会行为;社会学;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号