首页> 外文学位 >Conflict and consensus-building at the fourth UN World Conference on Women: A study of international nongovernmental cooperation.
【24h】

Conflict and consensus-building at the fourth UN World Conference on Women: A study of international nongovernmental cooperation.

机译:第四届联合国世界妇女大会上的冲突与建立共识:国际非政府合作研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This study looks at the process by which international non-governmental organizations set agendas for policy formation within the context of the UN. Over a period of two years, I conducted a qualitative study of three non-governmental organizations (NGOs) focusing on peace issues: the Women's International League for Peace and Freedom (WILPF), the Sudanese Women's Voice for Peace, and Beneath Paradise. Research sites included the 4th UN World Conference on Women (FWCW) that took place in Beijing, China in 1995 and four preparatory conferences organized around the FWCW including regional conferences in Austria and Senegal. I also collected data on the WILPF peace train which traveled with an international delegation of women peace activists from Helsinki, Finland to Beijing for the FWCW. I found that within the peace sector of the conference, the NGOs reached a "managed" consensus on common. priorities ignoring or leaving out controversial issues. The Western NGOs tended to dominate the process and set up an agenda for the coalition of organizations that reflected their own regional agenda. Some NGOs, particularly Third World, challenged the dominant Western agenda and conflict ensued. Using a combination of social movement tools, e.g. repertoires of contention, activist identities, and strategic framing, the NGOs achieved partial success in gaining attention for their agendas. As the conflict escalated, some of the NGO members tried to resolve or manage the conflicts using dialogue. I found that given certain conditions, such as a team of international facilitators and the willingness of participants to confront one another, these attempts at dialogue contained the potential to uncover difference, challenge the dominant discourse, identify underlying problems and breakdown stereotypes. As such, I conclude that dialogue has the potential to facilitate the agenda-setting process among NGOs.
机译:这项研究着眼于国际非政府组织在联合国范围内制定政策制定议程的过程。在两年的时间里,我对三个关注和平问题的非政府组织(NGO)进行了定性研究:妇女国际和平与自由联盟(WILPF),苏丹妇女争取和平的声音和天堂之下。研究地点包括1995年在中国北京举行的第四届联合国世界妇女大会(WWCW)和围绕FWCW举办的四次筹备会议,包括在奥地利和塞内加尔的区域会议。我还收集了有关WILPF和平列车的数据,该列车与一个国际妇女和平主义者代表团从芬兰赫尔辛基前往北京前往FWCW。我发现在会议的和平部门内,非政府组织就共同问题达成了“有管理的”共识。优先考虑忽略或排除有争议的问题。西方的非政府组织倾向于主导这一进程,并为反映其自身地区议程的组织建立议程。一些非政府组织,特别是第三世界组织,对西方主导的议程提出了挑战,随之而来的是冲突。使用社交活动工具的组合,例如在争用,激进主义者的身份和战略框架方面,非政府组织在吸引人们对其议程的关注方面取得了部分成功。随着冲突的升级,一些非政府组织成员试图通过对话解决或管理冲突。我发现,在一定条件下,例如一支国际推动者团队以及参与者愿意彼此面对的意愿,这些对话尝试具有发现差异,挑战主导性话语,确定潜在问题和破坏性定型观念的潜力。因此,我得出结论,对话有潜力促进非政府组织之间的议程制定过程。

著录项

  • 作者

    Snyder, Anna Christine.;

  • 作者单位

    Syracuse University.;

  • 授予单位 Syracuse University.;
  • 学科 Political Science International Law and Relations.;Sociology Social Structure and Development.;Womens Studies.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 1998
  • 页码 317 p.
  • 总页数 317
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:48:29

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号