首页> 外文学位 >A theological evaluation and comparison of the atonement and justification in the writings of James Henley Thornwell (1812--1862) and John Lafayette Girardeau (1825--1898).
【24h】

A theological evaluation and comparison of the atonement and justification in the writings of James Henley Thornwell (1812--1862) and John Lafayette Girardeau (1825--1898).

机译:詹姆士·亨利·索恩威尔(James Henley Thornwell,1812--1862年)和约翰·拉斐特·吉拉多(John Lafayette Girardeau,1825--1898年)著作中的赎罪和称义的神学评估和比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This dissertation compares and evaluates the doctrines of atonement and justification in the theologies of two prominent nineteenth century theologians of the Southern Presbyterian Church of the United States: James Henley Thornwell (1812- 1862) and John Lafayette Girardeau (1825-1898).;Structurally, Thornwell and Girardeau develop their systems of theology upon the foundation of the moral government of God and federal theology. Justification is the center of Thornwell's theology because it is the singular doctrine that bridges both covenants. Mediation is a key theological concept for both men because Adam, though he may represent his posterity before God, cannot mediate for them.;Thornwell articulates his primary discussion in response to Roman Catholicism, and Girardeau in response to Evangelical Arminianism. Both argue that justification turns on the question of the manner of righteousness, namely, inherent or imputed. Girardeau analyzes the meaning of the Apostle Paul's phrase, the righteousness of God, seeking to both logically and exegetically refute other positions, such as faith credited as righteousness. He concludes that the righteousness of God must be the imputed righteousness of Christ.;The doctrine of Adoption is also analyzed because of its relationship to justification. For Thornwell, adoption is the fruit of justification. Denying the universal fatherhood of God, he argues that mankind began existence only as a servant. However, God provides justification that one might become a child with all the rights of inheritance. Thus redemption is unto adoption. Girardeau argues that mankind was both child and servant at creation. Because one becomes a child of God through regeneration, it follows that mankind originally enjoyed a filial relationship. Through the fall, spiritual and legal sonship were lost. God disowned Adam and his posterity, rendering them children of wrath. Servanthood and sonship run parallel and thus justification and adoption are parallel effects of redemption.
机译:本论文比较并评估了美国南部长老会的两位十九世纪著名神学家的神学中的赎罪和称义学说:詹姆斯·亨利·索恩威尔(James Henley Thornwell,1812-1862年)和约翰·拉斐特·吉拉多(John Lafayette Girardeau,1825-1898年)。 ,Thornwell和Girardeau在上帝的道德统治和联邦神学的基础上发展了他们的神学体系。称义是索恩韦尔神学的中心,因为它是连接两个盟约的唯一学说。调解是这两个男人的主要神学概念,因为亚当虽然可以代表他的后代在上帝面前,却不能为他们进行调解。索恩威尔阐明了他对罗马天主教的回应和吉拉多对福音派亚美尼亚主义的回应。双方都认为,称义是关于正义的方式的问题,即固有或推崇的正义方式。吉拉多(Girardeau)分析了使徒保罗(Apostle Paul)所说的“上帝的义”一词的含义,力求在逻辑上和情感上驳斥其他立场,例如被认为是义的信仰。他得出的结论是,上帝的公义必须是基督的归咎于公义。;还对收养学说进行了分析,因为它与称义相关。对于Thornwell而言,采用是有理由的结果。他否认上帝的普遍父亲身份,他认为人类只是作为仆人才开始存在。然而,上帝提供了一个理由,一个人可以成为拥有所有继承权的孩子。因此,赎回是要领养的。吉拉多认为,人类在创造时既是孩子又是仆人。因为一个人通过再生成为上帝的孩子,所以人类最初享有一种孝顺的关系。在整个秋天,精神和法律上的儿子之辈都消失了。上帝剥夺了亚当和他的后代,使他们成为愤怒的孩子。奴役和儿子身份是并行的,因此称义和领养是救赎的并行效果。

著录项

  • 作者

    Sheppard, Craig A.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Wales, Lampeter (United Kingdom).;

  • 授予单位 University of Wales, Lampeter (United Kingdom).;
  • 学科 Religion History of.;Religion Biblical Studies.;Theology.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2009
  • 页码 340 p.
  • 总页数 340
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 舞蹈;
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:37:38
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号