首页> 外文学位 >Two essays on the land tenure institutions of Bulgaria: Evolution, land fragmentation and land productivity.
【24h】

Two essays on the land tenure institutions of Bulgaria: Evolution, land fragmentation and land productivity.

机译:关于保加利亚土地所有制的两篇文章:演变,土地分割和土地生产力。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This dissertation consists of two essays that address two distinct topics concerning the land tenure institutions of Bulgaria. The first essay studies the evolution of land tenure institutions, focusing on the period 1839--1944 during which the country experienced two distinct land tenure regimes---that of the late Ottoman Empire (1839--1878) and that of the post-liberation period (1878--1944). The major factors which determined the shape of these institutions are identified and analyzed by critically evaluating two theories of institutional change---the efficiency theory developed by Demsetz (1967) and the social conflict theory developed by Acemoglu, Johnson, and Robinson (2005). Consistent with the latter theory, the essay argues that political institutions and the distribution of resources determined the prevailing political balance which in turn determined the structure of land tenure institutions during 1839--1878. The process of institutional change was endogenous to the Ottoman Empire but exogenous to Bulgaria as the institutions of the latter were embedded into those of the former. During the 1878--1944 period, however, the initial source of prevailing political power was an external factor---the Russian occupation forces. The essay suggests that the social conflict theory be expanded to include the embeddedness factor and the role of external factors in the process of institutional change.;The second essay studies the extent and underlying causes of land fragmentation in Bulgaria and its impact on land productivity. Multiple regression analysis is used to examine the relationship between land fragmentation and land productivity. The source of data for the study is the 2003 Bulgarian Multi-topic Household Survey. The findings of this essay suggest that: (1) in contrast to previous research, there is not enough evidence to conclude that land fragmentation in Bulgaria is driven by supply-side factors such as partible inheritance or population growth; (2) the level of current land fragmentation is low to moderate; and (3) this level of fragmentation is not likely to adversely affect land productivity. Other conditions being equal, therefore, land consolidation may not lead to any significant improvement in productivity in Bulgaria.
机译:本文由两篇论文组成,涉及保加利亚土地所有权制度的两个不同主题。第一篇文章研究了土地保有权制度的演变,重点是1839--1944年期间,该国经历了两种不同的土地保有权制度,即奥斯曼帝国晚期(1839--1878)和后奥斯曼帝国时期。解放时期(1878--1944)。通过批判性地评估两种制度变迁理论来确定和分析决定这些制度变迁的主要因素,这两个理论是Demsetz(1967)提出的效率理论和Acemoglu,Johnson和Robinson(2005)提出的社会冲突理论。 。与后一种理论一致,本文认为,政治制度和资源分配决定了当时的政治平衡,而政治平衡反过来又决定了1839--1878年间土地保有权制度的结构。制度变迁的过程是奥斯曼帝国的内生性,但保加利亚却是外生的,因为后者的制度被嵌入到前者的制度中。然而,在1878--1944年期间,盛行的政治权力的最初来源是外部因素-俄罗斯占领军。文章建议将社会冲突理论扩展到包括制度变迁过程中的嵌入因素和外部因素的作用。第二篇文章研究保加利亚土地分割的程度和根本原因及其对土地生产力的影响。多元回归分析用于检验土地破碎化与土地生产力之间的关系。该研究的数据来源是2003年保加利亚多主题家庭调查。本文的研究结果表明:(1)与以前的研究相比,没有足够的证据得出保加利亚土地分割是由供应方的因素驱动的,例如部分继承或人口增长; (2)目前的土地分割水平低至中等; (3)这种破碎程度不会对土地生产力产生不利影响。因此,在其他条件相同的情况下,土地整理可能不会导致保加利亚的生产率显着提高。

著录项

  • 作者

    Boliari, Natalia.;

  • 作者单位

    Carleton University (Canada).;

  • 授予单位 Carleton University (Canada).;
  • 学科 History European.;Economics General.;Political Science Public Administration.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2009
  • 页码 248 p.
  • 总页数 248
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 欧洲史;政治理论;经济学;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号