首页> 外文学位 >Visual violence and the loss of selfhood in Guenderrode, Hoelderlin, and Fichte (Karoline von Guenderrode, Friedrich Hoelderlin, Johann Gottlieb Fichte).
【24h】

Visual violence and the loss of selfhood in Guenderrode, Hoelderlin, and Fichte (Karoline von Guenderrode, Friedrich Hoelderlin, Johann Gottlieb Fichte).

机译:在Guenderrode,Hoelderlin和Fichte(Karoline von Guenderrode,Friedrich Hoelderlin,Johann Gottlieb Fichte)发生视觉暴力和丧失自我。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This dissertation explores the links between visual violence and the loss of selfhood in three German authors around 1800, Karoline von Günderrode (1780–1806), Friedrich Hölderlin (1770–1843) and Johann Gottlieb Fichte (1762–1814), who are read as precursors of 20th-century continental philosophers of the gaze such as Sartre, Merleau-Ponty, and Baudrillard.; Arguing against the enlightenment myth of the self-transparent subject, the German Romantics and Idealists Günderrode, Hölderlin, and Fichte negotiate the precarious status of selfhood which subjects itself to conflicting scopic desires.; Chapter One discusses visual self-alienation and photophobic desire in Günderrode's poems, dramas, and epistolary writings. Throughout her work, Günderrode depicts all efforts of the isolated subject to merge with a motherly gaze and to lose itself in imagined icons of oneness as futile attempts to escape alienation. The violent underpinnings of scopic harmony become unavoidable for her characters and lyrical personae.; Chapter Two analyzes restrained scopic desire in Hölderlin's poem Patmos and the ironic desubjectivation of fields of vision in his last poems, in which seemingly idyllic landscapes have become empty of recognizable subjects.; Chapter Three addresses Fichte's writings and lectures on “Wissenschaftslehre,” especially the lectures between 1804 and 1812, in which he claims that self-reflective scopic procedures and pictorial constructions are contignent on the negation of the living self. Fichte criticizes, however, his own speculative and specular order as violent and concedes the impossibility of resolving the tensions empirical subject on the other. This subject stubbornly resists its own self-obliteration.
机译:本文探讨了1800年左右的三位德国作家Karoline vonGünderrode(1780–1806),FriedrichHölderlin(1770–1843)和Johann Gottlieb Fichte(1762–1814)共同探讨的视觉暴力与丧失自我之间的联系。注视着20世纪超大陆哲学家的先驱,例如萨特(Sartre),梅洛·庞蒂(Merleau-Ponty)和鲍德里亚(Baudrillard)。反对自透明主题的启蒙神话,德国浪漫主义者和理想主义者金德尔罗德,霍尔德林和费希特商谈了自我的pre可危状态,使自己遭受矛盾的表象欲望的困扰。第一章讨论了昆德罗德的诗歌,戏剧和书信写作中的视觉自我疏远和畏光欲望。在整个作品中,Günderrode描绘了孤立的对象为融合母亲的目光而付出的所有努力,并在想象中的一体性图标中迷失了自己,这是逃避疏远的徒劳尝试。对于她的角色和抒情人物而言,视觉和谐的暴力基础变得不可避免。第二章分析了霍尔德林的诗《斜体》和《帕特莫斯》中最后的诗对视觉领域的讽刺性的反主观化,后者似乎没有田园诗般的风景。第三章论述了费希特关于“维森查夫教堂”的著作和演讲,特别是1804年至1812年之间的演讲,他声称自我反省的视觉程序和图像结构在否定活着的自我方面是充实的。费希特批评他自己的投机和投机秩序是暴力的,并承认不可能以另一种方式解决紧张关系。这个对象顽固地抵抗自己的自我毁灭。

著录项

  • 作者

    Berwald, Olaf.;

  • 作者单位

    The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.;

  • 授予单位 The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.;
  • 学科 Literature Germanic.; Philosophy.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2000
  • 页码 262 p.
  • 总页数 262
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 哲学理论;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号