首页> 外文学位 >Honey bee (Apis mellifera L.) and bumble bee (Bombus impatiens cresson) pollination efficacy on field-grown cucumber and watermelon.
【24h】

Honey bee (Apis mellifera L.) and bumble bee (Bombus impatiens cresson) pollination efficacy on field-grown cucumber and watermelon.

机译:蜜蜂(Apis mellifera L.)和大黄蜂(Bombus impatiens cresson)对田间种植的黄瓜和西瓜的授粉功效。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Parasites and other problems plague the American beekeeping industry, resulting in a nationwide reduction in the number of honey be (Apis mellifera L.) colonies available for crop pollination. Bumble bee (Bombus spp.) colonies are now commercially-available in the United States and may provide an alternative pollination source for many insect-pollinated crops. Previous work by the author demonstrated the value of Bombus pollination on field-grown cucumber and watermelon at the individual bee-level (i.e., the number of bee visits to pistillate flowers required to set fruit comparable to flowers that received unlimited, or open, insect pollination).; Additional field studies were conducted to evaluate bumble bee versus honey bee pollination of field-grown cucumber and watermelon on other level which contribute to a species' overall potential utility as a commercial pollinator. The studies compared honey bee and bumble bee: (1) foraging activity periods (the onset, peak, and termination of foraging activity in relation to floral anthesis and duration); (2) floral visitation rates (the number of flowers visited per unit time by individual foragers; and (3) stigmatic pollen deposition (the number of pollen grains deposited on stigmas after single bee visits to pistillate flowers).; Bumble bees outperformed honey bees in all three comparative experiments on both cucumber and watermelon. Bumble bees initiated foraging activity 30 min before honey bees. This additional foraging time for Bombus may prove advantageous when high temperatures reduce floral receptivity to just a few morning hours.; Bumble bees also consistently visited more flowers per min and deposited equal or greater amounts of pollen than honey bees on both crops ( P 0.0001 for all tests). On cucumber, bumble bees visited an average of 2.12 times as many flowers per min and deposited 1.34 times as many pollen grains per visit than honey bees. On watermelon, bumble bees visited on average 2.35 times as many flowers per min and deposited 2.74 times as many pollen grains per visit than honey bees. Differences in floral visitation and pollen deposition rates between bee species were even greater during earlier morning sampling periods, which is when most cucurbits are optimally receptive under typical field conditions.
机译:寄生虫和其他问题困扰着美国养蜂业,导致全国范围内可用于农作物授粉的蜜蜂(Apis mellifera L.)菌落数量减少。大黄蜂(Bombus spp。)菌落现在在美国可以买到,可能为许多昆虫授粉的农作物提供替代的授粉来源。作者先前的工作表明,在个体蜜蜂水平上,孟买授粉对田间种植的黄瓜和西瓜的价值(即,蜜蜂访视雌花的次数,以使果实结实可与获得无限或开放昆虫的花朵媲美)授粉)。;进行了其他田间研究,以评估田间种植的黄瓜和西瓜在其他水平上的大黄蜂与蜜蜂授粉,这有助于该物种作为商业授粉媒介的整体潜在效用。研究比较了蜜蜂和大黄蜂:(1)觅食活动的时期(与花期和花期有关的觅食活动的开始,高峰和终止); (2)花探望率(单个觅食者每单位时间探望的花朵数量;和(3)柱头花粉沉积(单只蜜蜂探视雌花后在柱头上沉积的花粉粒数量)。大黄蜂的表现优于蜜蜂在黄瓜和西瓜的所有三个比较实验中,大黄蜂比蜜蜂早了30分钟开始觅食活动。当高温将花的亲和力降低到早上几个小时时,这种额外的Bombus觅食时间可能被证明是有利的;大黄蜂也始终如一地拜访在两种作物上,每分钟开花的花更多,并且花粉的沉积量等于或大于蜜蜂(所有测试的P <0.0001)在黄瓜上,大黄蜂平均每分钟开花的花量是2.12倍,而花粉的沉积量是花粉的1.34倍西瓜上的大黄蜂平均每分钟访问的花朵数量是蜜蜂的2.35倍,而花粉颗粒的平均沉积量是蜜蜂的2.74倍我比蜜蜂来拜访。在清晨的采样期间,蜜蜂品种之间的花访和花粉沉积速率之间的差异甚至更大,这是大多数葫芦科植物在典型田间条件下均能最佳接受的时候。

著录项

  • 作者单位

    North Carolina State University.;

  • 授予单位 North Carolina State University.;
  • 学科 Biology Entomology.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2000
  • 页码 193 p.
  • 总页数 193
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 昆虫学;
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:47:48

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号