首页> 外文学位 >Pavements and the environment: A life-cycle assessment approach.
【24h】

Pavements and the environment: A life-cycle assessment approach.

机译:路面与环境:一种生命周期评估方法。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The relationship between pavements and the environment is largely unquantified. Using life-cycle assessment as the evaluation framework, the impact from pavements can be quantified in order to uncover ways to minimize the environmental footprint of this vast civil infrastructure system. Research exists that begins to understand the relationship, but falls short of comprehensively characterizing the impact. Expanding our knowledge and sharpening our modeling are critical steps that the research presented here takes to support the creation of more sustainable pavements.;The lack of a comprehensive methodology with which to evaluate the impact of pavements is a significant shortfall which plagues the existing research. Pavements affect the environment not only during the manufacturing and placement of materials, but also through traffic delay, rolling resistance, the urban heat island effect, and other impact mechanisms. While these commonly excluded components may be less obvious, they are no less important and have the potential to be influential contributors to the overall life-cycle impact.;This research proposes a comprehensive methodology that includes the known components of the pavement life cycle. Although data availability, applicability of the components, and other project constraints will ultimately dictate the boundaries of a particular assessment, beginning with a comprehensive methodology offers practitioners the opportunity to make decisions based on discretion rather than ignorance. This will result in more equitable comparisons and functional conclusions that can be more confidently implemented in creating more sustainable pavements.;The ability to improve the environmental performance of pavements depends not only on using a comprehensive methodology, but also on having an in-depth knowledge of the components which comprise the life cycle. Research areas outside of the existing pavement life-cycle assessment literature may contain the best available information on the impact of individual components on the environment. Using global warming potential as the environmental indicator, ranges of impact for each component are calculated and compared based on the information uncovered in the research review. The relative impacts between components are found to be orders of magnitude different in many cases. For instance, the impact from rolling resistance has the potential to be four orders of magnitude larger than that of onsite equipment. By focusing improvement efforts on those components with large impact potentials, environmental performance can be improved more effectively. A strategic method to lowering the global warming potential of a pavement is developed based on this concept. The approach prioritizes evaluating components with high impact potential so as to maximize the efficiency and effectiveness of environmental improvements. It takes advantage of the fact that small changes in high-impact components will have more effect than large changes in low-impact components.;Finally, life-cycle assessment is used to evaluate the benefits and drawbacks of long-life pavements. Improved pavement design tools have made it possible to increase design lives to 100 years. This research examines whether designing pavements to serve extended periods of time is an environmentally beneficial practice. The results indicate that long-life pavements may not always be the best option due to the long periods of time before the benefits are realized. Roadway segments that will predictably support high traffic levels into the future are prime candidates for long-life designs. Conversely, segments with wavering, inconsistent demand are better served by pavements with more traditional design lives. These generalized scenarios demonstrate that long-life designs should not be ubiquitously applied to all new pavement construction, but rather to select pavements that offer the best chance of lowering life-cycle environmental impact.
机译:人行道与环境之间的关系在很大程度上未被量化。使用生命周期评估作为评估框架,可以量化人行道的影响,以发现将这一庞大的民用基础设施系统的环境足迹降至最低的方法。已有研究开始了解这种关系,但未能全面描述其影响。扩大我们的知识和完善我们的建模是此处提出的研究以支持创建更可持续的人行道的关键步骤。;缺乏用于评估人行道影响的综合方法论是困扰现有研究的重大不足。路面不仅在材料的制造和放置过程中会影响环境,还会通过交通延迟,滚动阻力,城市热岛效应和其他影响机制来影响环境。尽管这些通常被排除的组成部分可能不太明显,但它们同样重要,并且有可能对整个生命周期产生影响。•本研究提出了一种综合方法,其中包括路面生命周期的已知组成部分。尽管数据的可用性,组件的适用性以及其他项目约束最终将决定特定评估的范围,但从全面的方法开始,从业人员可以有机会根据判断力而不是无知来进行决策。这将导致更公平的比较和功能结论,可在创建更可持续的人行道时更放心地实施。;改善人行道的环境性能的能力不仅取决于使用全面的方法,而且取决于对知识的深入了解。组成生命周期的组件。现有路面生命周期评估文献之外的研究领域可能包含有关单个组件对环境影响的最佳可用信息。使用全球变暖潜势作为环境指标,根据研究综述中发现的信息,计算并比较每个组件的影响范围。在许多情况下,组件之间的相对影响被发现数量级不同。例如,滚动阻力的影响可能比现场设备的影响大四个数量级。通过将改进工作集中在具有较大影响潜力的那些组件上,可以更有效地改善环境绩效。基于这一概念,开发了一种降低人行道全球变暖潜能的战略方法。该方法优先评估具有高影响潜力的组件,以最大程度地提高环境改善的效率和效力。它充分利用了以下事实:高冲击力组件的小变化比低冲击力组件的大变化更有效。最后,使用生命周期评估来评估长寿命路面的利弊。改进的路面设计工具使将设计寿命延长至100年成为可能。这项研究检查了设计可延长使用时间的人行道是否对环境有益。结果表明,长寿命的人行道可能并不总是最好的选择,因为实现收益的时间很长。可以预测未来将支持高流量水平的道路段是长寿命设计的主要候选对象。相反,具有更传统设计寿命的人行道可以更好地满足那些摇摆不定,需求不一致的路段。这些概括的场景表明,长寿命设计不应普遍应用于所有新的人行道建筑,而应选择能够提供最佳机会降低生命周期环境影响的人行道。

著录项

  • 作者

    Santero, Nicholas Joseph.;

  • 作者单位

    University of California, Berkeley.;

  • 授予单位 University of California, Berkeley.;
  • 学科 Engineering Civil.;Engineering Environmental.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2009
  • 页码 251 p.
  • 总页数 251
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 建筑科学;环境污染及其防治;
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:37:40

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号