首页> 外文学位 >Boundary wars: The political struggle over public and private social benefits in the United States.
【24h】

Boundary wars: The political struggle over public and private social benefits in the United States.

机译:边界战争:美国针对公共和私人社会利益的政治斗争。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The United States hosts a much larger sphere of privately provided social welfare goods and services than do other affluent western democracies. In the vast literature on the American welfare state, however, this defining feature of U.S. social policy has received limited attention and its political causes and consequences remain largely unexplored.;"Boundary Wars" explores the politics of the "American welfare regime," the complex of public and private social benefits that constitutes America's unusual social policy framework. Examining the political development of health and retirement benefits in the twentieth century, it explains why private social benefits have such a privileged place in U.S. social policy and why the role of these benefits differs so sharply across the health insurance and pension domains. In doing so, it shows that employment-based social benefits are deeply shaped by public policy and, in turn, critically influence the politics of public social programs.;At the theoretical core of the study is an explanatory framework that explicates the political differences between alternative means of achieving social welfare aims. This framework suggests that policies governing private benefits are less likely to redistribute income and risk than are public social programs and are more likely to develop through subterranean political channels and attract the support of political actors otherwise hostile to government intervention. It also shows that private social benefits have characteristic "policy feedback" effects that reshape political coalitions and preferences. Just as widely distributed public social benefits give rise to embedded institutions and vested interests, the extensive development of private social benefits has the potential to create formidable political obstacles to the extension of public insurance or provision. This, indeed, is a principal reason why opponents of public programs have historically championed private benefits and public policies supportive of them.;By uncovering and explaining the political struggles behind the development of the American welfare regime, "Boundary Wars" shows that the rise of private social benefits is as much a political story as the development of the welfare state, and no less constitutive of America's exceptional path.
机译:与其他富裕的西方民主国家相比,美国拥有更大范围的私人提供的社会福利产品和服务。但是,在有关美国福利国家的大量文献中,美国社会政策的这一决定性特征受到的关注很少,其政治原因和后果仍未得到充分探索。“边界战争”探讨了“美国福利制度”的政治。公共和私人社会福利综合体,构成了美国不同寻常的社会政策框架。研究了20世纪健康和退休福利的政治发展,它​​解释了为什么私人社会福利在美国社会政策中占有如此特权的地位,以及为什么这些福利在健康保险和养老金领域的作用如此巨大地不同。这样做表明,基于就业的社会利益是公共政策的深层影响,进而对公共社会计划的政治产生了批判性影响。该研究的理论核心是一个解释框架,它阐明了两性之间的政治差异。实现社会福利目标的替代方法。该框架表明,与私人社会计划相比,管理私人利益的政策不太可能重新分配收入和风险,并且更可能通过地下政治渠道发展并吸引否则会受到政府干预的政治参与者的支持。它还表明,私人社会利益具有特征性的“政策反馈”效应,从而重塑了政治联盟和偏好。正如广泛分布的公共社会福利产生了内在的制度和既得利益一样,私人社会福利的广泛发展也有可能为扩展公共保险或保险提供巨大的政治障碍。的确,这是反对公共计划的人一直拥护私人利益和支持公共利益的公共政策的主要原因。;通过揭露和解释美国福利制度发展背后的政治斗争,“边界战争”表明了这种崛起私人社会利益的描述与福利国家的发展一样,都是政治故事,并且同样构成美国特殊道路的组成部分。

著录项

  • 作者

    Hacker, Jacob Stewart.;

  • 作者单位

    Yale University.;

  • 授予单位 Yale University.;
  • 学科 Political Science Public Administration.;History United States.;Sociology Public and Social Welfare.;Health Sciences Public Health.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2000
  • 页码 476 p.
  • 总页数 476
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号