首页> 外文学位 >Best books for young adults: An analysis of the structural, stylistic, and thematic characteristics of the 1998 Best Books for Young Adults and 1998 Quick Picks for Reluctant Young Adult Readers.
【24h】

Best books for young adults: An analysis of the structural, stylistic, and thematic characteristics of the 1998 Best Books for Young Adults and 1998 Quick Picks for Reluctant Young Adult Readers.

机译:面向年轻人的最佳书籍:对1998年面向年轻人的最佳书籍和1998年不愿为年轻人阅读的读者的精选书籍的结构,文体和主题特征的分析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This study analyzed the 1998 Best Books for Young Adults list and 1998 Quick Picks for the Reluctant Young Adult Reader list to determine what characteristics the books possess that make them "best" books for young adults and to compare the two lists to determine how a best book for a reluctant reader differs from a best book for a young adult. Research questions guiding the study asked what are the structural, stylistic, and thematic characteristics of a best book for young adults and a best book for reluctant readers, and how do the books designated for reluctant readers differ from the best books for young adults?; The study sample consisted of all of the books on the 1998 Best Books and Quick Picks lists. For analysis purposes, the books were separated into three groups based on the genre of the book: fiction, collections, and nonfiction. Different evaluation forms were created for each genre. Fiction and collections evaluation forms were guided by the analysis framework used by Lukens and Cline (1995); nonfiction evaluation forms were guided by the work of Carter and Abrahamson (1990). Outstanding features of each book were recorded as exceptional points.; Content, what a book is about, and character were the most important aspects of fiction and collections books. Quick Picks fiction often tends to be more plot driven than Best Books, Collections have darker modes and exceptional format more often than fiction. Nonfiction varies widely from the other genres and between lists. Structure, style, and thematic elements are exceptional in almost half to almost all nonfiction books. All Best Books in all genres are generally more complex than Quick Picks books, although nonfiction is only slightly more complex than Quick Picks.; The fiction and collections on both lists generally match the characteristics deemed important by traditional, literary criticism, indicating a consensus by both committees on what good fiction should be. Nonfiction is a different matter. The wide variation in nonfiction results indicate the lack of a common knowledge base about what constitutes nonfiction.
机译:这项研究分析了1998年的“最佳青年书籍”列表和1998年的“不愿意的青年读者快速选择”列表,以确定这些书具有哪些特征使其成为年轻人的“最佳”书籍,并比较这两个列表以确定最佳书籍给不愿阅读的读者的书不同于给年轻人的最佳书。指导研究的研究问题询问,一本针对年轻人的最佳书籍和一本针对勉强读者的最佳书籍的结构,文体和主题特征是什么?以及为不愿阅读的读者指定的书籍与针对年轻人的最佳书籍有何不同?该研究样本包括1998年“最佳书籍和快速选择”列表中的所有书籍。出于分析目的,根据书籍的类型将书籍分为三类:小说,收藏和非小说。为每种流派创建了不同的评估表。小说和收藏品评估表以卢肯斯和克莱恩(1995)使用的分析框架为指导;非小说类评估表以Carter和Abrahamson(1990)的工作为指导。每本书的突出特点都被记录为例外。内容,一本书的内容和性格是小说和珍藏书最重要的方面。 “快速精选”小说往往比“最佳书籍”更受情节驱动,与“小说”相比,“收藏”具有更暗的模式和特殊的格式。非小说与其他流派和列表之间差异很大。在几乎所有非小说类书籍中,结构,样式和主题元素都是例外。尽管非小说类作品仅比《 Quick Picks》稍微复杂一些,但所有类型的所有《 Best Books》通常比《 Quick Picks》更为复杂。这两份名单上的小说和收藏大体上符合传统文学批评所认为的重要特征,这表明两个委员会都对好的小说应该达成共识。非小说是另一回事。非小说类作品的结果差异很大,这表明缺乏关于什么构成非小说类作品的共同知识基础。

著录项

  • 作者

    Mundy, JaNae Jenkins.;

  • 作者单位

    Texas Woman's University.;

  • 授予单位 Texas Woman's University.;
  • 学科 Library Science.; Education Reading.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2000
  • 页码 364 p.
  • 总页数 364
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 图书馆学、图书馆事业;教育;
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:47:33

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号