”. Its premise is that customary i'/> The limits on a state's right to exclude and expel non-citizens under customary international and human rights treaty law.
首页> 外文学位 >The limits on a state's right to exclude and expel non-citizens under customary international and human rights treaty law.
【24h】

The limits on a state's right to exclude and expel non-citizens under customary international and human rights treaty law.

机译:根据习惯国际和人权条约法,国家对非公民的排斥和驱逐权的限制。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The thesis is entitled “Limits on the State's Right to Exclude and Expel non-citizens under Customary International and Human Rights Law”. Its premise is that customary international and human fights treaty law have developed during the course of the last 50 years to a point where they now impose important limitations on state sovereignty with respect to the admission and exclusion of non-citizens. I argue that under customary international law the prohibition against refoulement or the forcible return of a refugee to a country to where he/she faces persecution is a principle of customary international law, as is the provision against the return of any person to a country where he/she faces a risk of torture.; I also examine the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, the European Convention on Human Rights and the Convention Against Torture. Pursuant to these international human rights treaty laws, several principles which bind all signatories have emerged. These are: (1) Removal of any person back to a country where there is a risk of torture. (2) The prohibition also extends to the deportation of a person to a country where he or she is at risk of other forms of cruel and inhuman treatment. (3) By the same token, the deportation of a parent whose children are citizens of the country from which he/she is being deported is prohibited until the best interests of the children are taken into account. The best interests of the children must be given considerable weight. (4) Long term permanent residents who have grown up in the country in which they are residents have a fight to remain in that country and cannot be deported notwithstanding the interests of the state in removing them.; I conclude by arguing that the most effective way of enforcing these rights is through the national courts. In Canada it is possible to use international human rights treaties as a tool for interpreting the Charter of Rights and Freedoms.
机译:论文标题为“ <习惯>国际习惯法和人权法规定的国家对非公民的排斥和驱逐权的限制”。它的前提是,习惯国际和人道战斗条约法在过去的50年中发展到了一个程度,即现在它们在接纳和排斥非公民方面对国家主权施加了重要限制。我认为,根据习惯国际法,禁止驱回或将难民强行送回其遭受迫害的国家是习惯国际法的一项原则,关于禁止返回的规定也是如此。任何人到他/她面临酷刑危险的国家;我还研究了《公民及政治权利国际公约》,《欧洲人权公约》和《禁止酷刑公约》。根据这些国际人权条约法,出现了约束所有签署国的几项原则。这些是:(1)将任何人遣返有遭受酷刑危险的国家。 (2)该禁令还扩展到将某人驱逐到有其他形式残忍和不人道待遇危险的国家。 (3)同样,在考虑到儿童的最大利益之前,禁止将其子女驱逐出境的父母驱逐出境。必须给予儿童最大的利益。 (4)在他们居住的国家长大的长期永久居民有争取继续留在该国的斗争,尽管国家出于遣散他们的利益不能将其驱逐出境;最后,我争辩说,执行这些权利的最有效方法是通过国家法院。在加拿大,可以使用国际人权条约作为解释《权利与自由宪章》的工具。

著录项

  • 作者

    Waldman, Lorne Allan.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Toronto (Canada).;

  • 授予单位 University of Toronto (Canada).;
  • 学科 Law.; Political Science General.; Political Science International Law and Relations.
  • 学位 LL.M.
  • 年度 2000
  • 页码 202 p.
  • 总页数 202
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 法律;政治理论;国际法;
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:47:33

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号