首页> 外文学位 >A comparison of auditory and visual in-vehicle information displays.
【24h】

A comparison of auditory and visual in-vehicle information displays.

机译:听觉和视觉车载信息显示的比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The vast majority of information used by automobile drivers is acquired visually, yet in many driving situations, driver's visual channel is perceptually overloaded. Despite this recognition of drivers' limitations to process more visual information, plans to add in-vehicle information systems have focused primarily on the use of visual display interfaces.; Two experiments examined the effectiveness of presenting in-vehicle auditory information to drivers to determine if this type of display could serve as a viable alternative to visual information display. In the first experiment, 24 participants were presented with roadway sign information using either graphic images or natural voice audio recordings. The road signs selected for display contained either symbolic or text-based messages. Following presentation of the information, participants were asked to identify whether the displayed message matched a projected sign image. Performance accuracy and reaction times for recognition of the projected signs were measured. Participants' use of information presented on auditory displays was as fast and accurate as their use of information presented on visual displays. Performance based on symbolic or text message type did not depend on the type of display used to present the information.; A second experiment looked at the effects of noise distracters on auditory and visual displays. The addition of music or talk radio background noise to the test environment did not differentially affect participant's reaction time or accuracy of performance to information presented via auditory or visual displays. The type of background noise made no difference in the driver's use of either text or symbol-based signs. However, there was some indication that background noise increases overall reaction time and this should be further studied.; This suggests that there are safety factors associated with adding in-vehicle visual displays to automobiles. However, the results of both experiments indicate that with consideration for message type, auditory information displays can effectively inform drivers and should be considered where feasible.
机译:汽车驾驶员使用的绝大多数信息都是通过视觉获取的,但是在许多驾驶情况下,驾驶员的视觉通道在感觉上是超负荷的。尽管已认识到驾驶员在处理更多视觉信息方面的局限性,但增加车载信息系统的计划仍主要集中在视觉显示界面的使用上。两项实验检验了向驾驶员提供车载听觉信息的有效性,以确定这种类型的显示是否可以替代视觉信息显示。在第一个实验中,使用图形图像或自然语音录音向24位参与者提供了道路标志信息。选择显示的路标包含符号或基于文本的消息。信息呈现后,要求参与者确定显示的消息是否与投影的标志图像匹配。测量了识别投影信号的性能准确性和反应时间。参与者对听觉显示器上呈现的信息的使用与他们对视觉显示器上呈现的信息的使用一样快速,准确。基于符号或文本消息类型的性能不取决于用于显示信息的显示类型。第二个实验研究了噪音分散器对听觉和视觉显示的影响。在测试环境中添加音乐或广播电台背景噪声不会对参与者的反应时间或通过听觉或视觉显示呈现的信息的准确性产生影响。背景噪声的类型对驾驶员使用基于文本或基于符号的标志没有影响。但是,有迹象表明背景噪声会增加总的反应时间,这需要进一步研究。这表明与在汽车上添加车载视觉显示器相关的安全因素。但是,两个实验的结果都表明,考虑到消息类型,听觉信息显示可以有效地告知驾驶员,应在可行的情况下予以考虑。

著录项

  • 作者

    Bruce, Deborah Sue.;

  • 作者单位

    George Mason University.;

  • 授予单位 George Mason University.;
  • 学科 Psychology Cognitive.; Transportation.; Engineering Automotive.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2000
  • 页码 58 p.
  • 总页数 58
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 心理学;综合运输;自动化技术及设备;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号