首页> 外文学位 >Comparison of open graded friction course mix design methods currently used in the United States.
【24h】

Comparison of open graded friction course mix design methods currently used in the United States.

机译:目前在美国使用的开放级摩擦过程混合设计方法的比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This research compares the open graded friction course (OGFC) mix design methods which are currently being used in the United States. OGFCs are a type of porous pavement that have been used in the United States since 1944, but has provided inconsistent and highly variable performance results. The design procedures for several agencies were obtained, and then compared for similarities. All of the design methods were then conducted to determine the optimum binder content. The optimum binder content (OBC) of a single aggregate gradation for each method was tested for properties and performance characteristics.;The design methods which are currently used all fall into three categories. The first is a property and performance specification where samples of various binder contents are tested for certain characteristics and samples prepared of the OBC have to meet a set of criteria. The second is an oil absorption method where the oil absorption of the aggregate is used in a series of empirical calculations to determine the optimum binder content. The final method is a visual determination where binder draindown is visually analyzed to determine the optimum binder content.;Although most of the trends in testing data follow that of a dense graded pavement, a few characteristics did not. The air voids, VFA, porosity, permeability, and abrasion data trends were all seen as expected. The BSG and VMA results did not show the trend, but can be attributed to the high air void content of OGFCs.;The design methods produced optimum binder contents which had high variability. The oil absorption and visual determination methods all produced a single optimum binder content which varied over 0.5%. The property and performance specification results showed a range of results which were only capped by the binder content range used in research.
机译:这项研究比较了美国目前正在使用的开放级摩擦过程(OGFC)混合设计方法。 OGFC是自1944年以来在美国使用的一种多孔路面,但其性能结果不一致且变化很大。获得了几个代理商的设计程序,然后比较了相似性。然后进行所有设计方法以确定最佳粘合剂含量。测试了每种方法的单一骨料级配的最佳粘合剂含量(OBC)的性能和性能特征。;目前使用的设计方法均分为三类。第一个是性能和性能规范,其中要测试各种粘合剂含量的样品的某些特性,而OBC制备的样品必须满足一组标准。第二种是吸油方法,其中在一系列经验计算中使用骨料的吸油量来确定最佳粘合剂含量。最终的方法是目视确定,其中目测分析粘合剂的排水量,以确定最佳的粘合剂含量。尽管测试数据的大多数趋势遵循致密渐变路面的趋势,但一些特性没有。空气孔隙,VFA,孔隙率,渗透性和磨损数据趋势均符合预期。 BSG和VMA结果没有显示出趋势,但是可以归因于OGFC的高气孔含量。设计方法产生了具有高变异性的最佳粘合剂含量。吸油和目视测定方法均产生了单个最佳粘合剂含量,其变化范围超过0.5%。性能和性能规格结果显示了一系列结果,这些结果仅受研究中使用的粘合剂含量范围的限制。

著录项

  • 作者

    Kline, Laura Catherine.;

  • 作者单位

    Clemson University.;

  • 授予单位 Clemson University.;
  • 学科 Civil engineering.
  • 学位 M.Engr.
  • 年度 2010
  • 页码 103 p.
  • 总页数 103
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号