首页> 外文学位 >'Liquid handcuffs': The phenomenology of recovering on methadone maintenance.
【24h】

'Liquid handcuffs': The phenomenology of recovering on methadone maintenance.

机译:“液体手铐”:美沙酮维持治疗后恢复的现象。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This study offers an interpretive understanding (verstehen) and an empathetic explication (einfuhlen) of the recovery ideal through the experiences of methadone patients. The sociological literature is replete with efficacy studies on the methadone approach to wellness and health. Yet, there is an unmistakable meaning lacuna in the body of researches on methadone. By a meaning lacuna, I am referring to the wholesale exclusion, whether consciously or not, of the patient's voice in researches on methadone. Nowhere is the structure versus meaning chasm in the sociology of health and illness as manifest as in the literature on former heroin addicts who are now methadone patients. By structure, I am referring to Pearlin's (1992) categorization of the two researches in the sociology of health and illness. Structure research, or those agendas concerned with effects and outcomes, dominates the literature on methadone maintenance. There are a plethora of good studies that attempt to show the efficacy of this treatment alternative (Ball et al. 1995; Widman et al. 1996; Newman 1995; Liappas et al. 1988; Lehmann et al. 1993; Weinstein et al. 1993). Similarly, there is an overbearing amount of critical studies elucidating the many latent social problems with the maintenance option (Aileen et al. 1998; Best et al. 1999; Mino et al. 1998; Churnaud et al. 1998; Wasserman et al. 1998; Zanis et al. 1998; Magura et al. 1998; Chatham et al. 1995; Alterman et al. 1998; and Mangura et al. 1999). This study contributes to the literature on methadone maintenance through a meaning-based analysis of the recovery ideal. Hence, the central question for this enterprise is this: How do methadone patients make sense of---and understand---the meaning of recovery in their illness careers, and what meaning is ascribed to the drug methadone in that recovery process? Finally, by appropriating the depth ethnographic interview (Spradley 1979; Weiss 1994; Geertz 1983; Strauss and Corbin 1990) to understand the meaning of recovery for methadone patients, this study contributes key policy suggestions that might improve the way methadone is delivered and assuage many of the accompanying problems associated with the treatment.
机译:这项研究通过美沙酮患者的经验提供了对康复理想的解释性理解(verstehen)和移情解释(einfuhlen)。社会学文献中充斥着有关美沙酮对健康和健康影响的功效研究。然而,在美沙酮的研究中存在着一个明确的意义缺陷。我的意思是说,在美沙酮研究中,无论是有意还是无意,都将患者的声音完全排除在外。在关于健康和疾病的社会学中,结构与意义鸿沟无处可寻,正如有关以前是美沙酮患者的海洛因成瘾者的文献所显示的那样。从结构上讲,我指的是Pearlin(1992)对健康和疾病社会学的两项研究的分类。结构研究或与效果和结果有关的议程主导着美沙酮维持的文献。有大量好的研究试图证明这种治疗方法的有效性(Ball等人1995; Widman等人1996; Newman 1995; Liappas等人1988; Lehmann等人1993; Weinstein等人1993 )。类似地,有大量的批判性研究阐明了维持选择的许多潜在社会问题(Aileen等人1998; Best等人1999; Mino等人1998; Churnaud等人1998; Wasserman等人1998 ; Zanis等人1998; Magura等人1998; Chatham等人1995; Alterman等人1998;以及Mangura等人1999)。这项研究通过对恢复理想的基于意义的分析,为美沙酮维持的文献做出了贡献。因此,这家企业的中心问题是:美沙酮患者如何在其疾病职业生涯中理解(并理解)康复的含义,以及美沙酮在康复过程中的含义是什么?最后,通过采用深度人种学访谈法(Spradley 1979; Weiss 1994; Geertz 1983; Strauss and Corbin 1990)来了解美沙酮患者康复的意义,该研究提出了重要的政策建议,可能会改善美沙酮的递送方式并减轻许多人的痛苦与治疗相关的伴随问题。

著录项

  • 作者

    Vigilant, Lee Garth.;

  • 作者单位

    Boston College.;

  • 授予单位 Boston College.;
  • 学科 Educational sociology.;Public policy.;Criminology.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2001
  • 页码 333 p.
  • 总页数 333
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号