首页> 外文学位 >The economic impact of the American Civil War: An empirical examination.
【24h】

The economic impact of the American Civil War: An empirical examination.

机译:美国内战的经济影响:一项实证研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The Civil War is the defining event in American History. It is also an event with great economic significance. Economic historians have learned a great deal about the economy in the 19th century in both the North and South. This dissertation shows that additional work can be done by economists to explain historical phenomena.; The first chapter discusses the impact of War on economies, focusing specifically on the Civil War. Both the destruction of the War and the end of slavery had an impact on the Southern economy. The functioning of the Southern slave based economy is examined, including the short and long run impact of emancipation. In addition, the destruction of physical and human capital by the Civil War is explored. The Northern economy is also examined, along with the hypothesis that Northern states grew faster after the Civil War than before.; The second chapter is an empirical deconstruction of the fall in state incomes between 1860 and 1870. Some economists suggest that the destruction of physical capital that occurred during the Civil War was responsible for postwar Southern poverty. Others suggest that the fall in income was brought about by emancipation and the end of the prewar slave based economy. This paper attempts to examine these two Civil War related shocks and to determine their relative magnitude. The results presented here indicate both destruction and slavery are significant. However, it seems that the damage done to Southern state incomes by the end of slavery is much larger than that done by capital destruction for all states except Virginia.; The third chapter deals with convergence during the reconstruction period. Neoclassical economic models and empirical work suggest that states or regions with similar institutional structures should have incomes that converge. After the Civil War, both Northern and Southern incomes had fallen, but Southern incomes fell much further. Over the next 30 years, intra-regional convergence occurred in both the North and the South, but inter-regional convergence did not. This lack of inter-regional convergence can be explained by the South's institutional structure in the immediate postwar era.
机译:内战是美国历史上的决定性事件。这也是具有重大经济意义的事件。经济史学家在19世纪的北方和南方都学到了很多有关经济的知识。本文表明,经济学家可以做更多的工作来解释历史现象。第一章讨论了战争对经济的影响,特别是内战。战争的破坏和奴隶制的终结都对南方经济产生了影响。考察了南部奴隶制经济的功能,包括解放的短期和长期影响。此外,还探讨了内战对物质和人力资本的破坏。北方经济在南北战争之后比以前增长更快的假设也得到了检验。第二章是对1860年至1870年间国家收入下降的经验解构。一些经济学家认为,内战期间发生的有形资本的破坏是造成战后南部贫困的原因。其他人则认为,收入的下降是由于解放和战前奴隶制经济的结束而造成的。本文试图研究这两次与内战有关的冲击,并确定它们的相对强度。这里显示的结果表明破坏和奴隶制都是重要的。然而,看来奴隶制结束对南部各州收入造成的损害要比除弗吉尼亚州以外的所有州的资本破坏所造成的损害要大得多。第三章论述了重建时期的趋同。新古典主义经济学模型和实证研究表明,具有类似制度结构的州或地区的收入应会聚。内战之后,北方和南方的收入都下降了,但是南方的收入下降了很多。在接下来的30年中,北部和南部地区都发生了区域内趋同,但区域间趋同并未发生。战后初期南方的体制结构可以解释这种地区间融合的缺乏。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号