首页> 外文学位 >Superfund implementation analysis: Examining the program's unintended consequences and environmental progress.
【24h】

Superfund implementation analysis: Examining the program's unintended consequences and environmental progress.

机译:超级基金实施分析:检查计划的意外后果和环境进度。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This dissertation empirically examines Superfund, the federal program that remediates the nation's worst abandoned and uncontrolled hazardous waste sites. The first chapter explores the influence of Superfund participation on current hazardous waste generated under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). I model hazardous waste generation as a function of programmatic, political, economic and social variables. I test this model using Ordinary Least Squares regression. Results indicate that economic variables are the most influential factors affecting hazardous waste generation. When Superfund participation influences waste generation, it is in an unexpected direction: participation is associated with increased waste generation. The second chapter examines environmental progress in the Superfund program. Specifically, this research explores why some sites are more likely to reach “construction complete” than others. Logistic regression is used to test four theoretical models of Superfund remedial progress: (1) Administrative convenience; (2) Problem Severity; (3) Political Pressure; and (4) Intergovernmental Coordination. The results indicate that the EPA is much more likely to tackle “easier” sites within the program and intergovernmental cooperation facilitates site remediation. Surprisingly, community groups are associated with decreased remedial progress. Chapter three explores the influence of community groups on remedy selection at Superfund sites. I create two models of EPA decision-making: (1) bureaucratic professionalism; and (2) bureaucratic responsiveness. I use ordinal logistic regression to test these two models. The results suggest that community groups do not systematically impact agency decision-making. Rather, this analysis indicates that the EPA is more likely to select stringent health protective remedies at sites where the agency has tracked down a responsible party. Site severity also influences remedy selection: more health protective remedies are selected at higher risk sites.
机译:本文从经验上考察了超级基金(Superfund),该联邦计划对美国最严重的废弃和不受控制的危险废物场进行补救。第一章探讨了超级基金参与对根据《资源保护和回收法》(RCRA)产生的当前危险废物的影响。我将危险废物的产生建模为程序,政治,经济和社会变量的函数。我使用普通最小二乘回归测试此模型。结果表明,经济变量是影响危险废物产生的最有影响力的因素。当超级基金参与影响废物产生时,它的方向出乎意料:参与与增加废物产生有关​​。第二章探讨了超级基金计划中的环境进展。具体而言,这项研究探讨了为什么某些站点比其他站点更可能“完成建设”。 Logistic回归用于检验超级基金补救进度的四个理论模型:(1)行政便利性; (2)问题严重性; (3)政治压力; (4)政府间协调。结果表明,EPA更可能解决该计划中的“更轻松”站点,而政府间合作则促进了站点修复。令人惊讶的是,社区团体与补救进度的下降有关。第三章探讨了社区群体对超级基金站点选择补救措施的影响。我创建了EPA决策的两个模型:(1)官僚专业精神; (2)官僚反应。我使用序数逻辑回归来测试这两个模型。结果表明,社区团体不会系统地影响代理商的决策。相反,该分析表明,EPA更可能在该机构追踪责任方的地点选择严格的健康保护措施。部位严重性也会影响药物的选择:在高风险部位选择更多的健康保护药物。

著录项

  • 作者

    Daley, Dorothy Marie.;

  • 作者单位

    University of California, Davis.;

  • 授予单位 University of California, Davis.;
  • 学科 Political Science General.; Environmental Sciences.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2001
  • 页码 118 p.
  • 总页数 118
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 政治理论;环境科学基础理论;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号