首页> 外文学位 >The production of subjectivity: Marx and contemporary continental thought (Karl Marx).
【24h】

The production of subjectivity: Marx and contemporary continental thought (Karl Marx).

机译:主体性的产生:马克思与当代大陆思想(卡尔·马克思)。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This project is an attempt to frame and develop the questions: What is the relation between the economy, what Marx called the mode of production, and transformations of subjectivity (the self) and social relations? How is it possible to think these relations without reducing one to the other, or effacing one for the sake of the other? In short, how can we think the materiality of subjectivity? Several different discourses and lines of research provoke these questions. First, recent and not so recent work within continental philosophy (especially Foucault, Deleuze, and Guattari) in relation to the “critique of the subject,” argues for an investigation of the practices of knowledge, power, and desire productive of historically determinate forms of subjectivity. The second line of research includes a history of heterogeneous Marxist (western Marxist or post-Marxist) thinkers all of whom attempt to locate in Marx's texts a series of questions, largely unresolved, regarding the relations between production and power, politics and the economy, culture and materiality. To identify these two discourses as provocations, however, is not to suggest that what is at stake in this project is the simple adjudication, or settling of accounts, between Marxism and post-structuralism—a question which would only be of interest to a handful of academics. Rather the investigation into these two lines of research has as its framework a larger and somewhat inchoate series of questions regarding the contemporary socio-historical condition. These questions all begin from the intuition that contemporary society, what is called “post-industrial,” “postmodern,” or “information society,” entails a fundamental transformation of the relations, or an accelerated breakdown of the divisions, between the spheres of the economy, culture, politics, and subjectivity. I argue that these questions, and the current juncture which they attempt to grasp, can be clarified through an articulation of the complex relation between the mode of production and the production of subjectivity; such an articulation takes the form of a genealogy of various critical junctures in the writing of Marx, the debates within western Marxism and critical theory, and contemporary continental philosophy.
机译:这个项目试图构架和发展以下问题:经济,马克思所谓的生产方式与主观性(自我)和社会关系的转变之间是什么关系?怎么可能想到这些关系而又不减少彼此的关系,或者为了另一种关系而抹煞一个关系?简而言之,我们如何看待主体性的重要性?几种不同的论述和研究方向引发了这些问题。首先,大陆哲学(特别是福柯,德勒兹和瓜塔里)在“主题的批判”方面的近期而非近期工作,主张对知识,权力和渴望产生历史决定性形式的实践进行调查。主观性研究的第二行包括异质的马克思主义(西方马克思主义或后马克思主义)思想家的历史,所有这些思想家都试图在马克思的著作中找到一系列有关生产与权力,政治和经济之间关系的问题,这些问题在很大程度上尚未解决,文化和物质性。但是,把这两种话语认定为挑衅,并不是要暗示这个项目的关键是马克思主义与后结构主义之间的简单裁断或账目结算-这个问题只有少数人会感兴趣的学者。相反,对这两类研究的调查以其框架为基础,涉及当代社会历史条件的一系列更大且有点早期的问题。这些问题都是从直觉开始的,即当代社会,即所谓的“后工业”,“后现代”或“信息社会”,需要在两个领域之间进行关系的根本转变或分歧的加速崩溃。经济,文化,政治和主观性。我认为,这些问题以及他们试图抓住的当前关头,可以通过阐明生产方式与主观生产之间的复杂关系来阐明。这种表述形式包括:马克思写作中各种关键关头的家谱,西方马克思主义和批判理论中的辩论以及当代大陆哲学。

著录项

  • 作者

    Read, Jason D.;

  • 作者单位

    State University of New York at Binghamton.;

  • 授予单位 State University of New York at Binghamton.;
  • 学科 Philosophy.; Literature Classical.; History General.; Political Science General.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2001
  • 页码 329 p.
  • 总页数 329
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 哲学理论;世界文学;世界史;政治理论;
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:47:06

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号