首页> 外文学位 >Technical and management aspects and socio-cultural perceptions of sea turtle bycatch in Ecuador.
【24h】

Technical and management aspects and socio-cultural perceptions of sea turtle bycatch in Ecuador.

机译:厄瓜多尔海龟兼捕的技术和管理以及社会文化观念。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Due to the technological improvements of the last two decades, it is possible for innovations to follow each other rapidly. However, not all innovations are useful ones, and a lot of producers often do not know how to market their new products. Diffusion theory, started by Gabriel Tarde (1903), first proposed the S-shaped diffusion curve. After this research few investigations followed until 1943. In this year Bryce Ryan and Neal Gross published their study about innovation diffusion. This led to an enormous overflow of publications. Later, Rogers (2003) contributed additional research and many others followed him.;When an individual or a company comes up with a new idea, they want this idea to be adopted by all potential users as soon as possible. This spreading of an innovation is called diffusion. According to Rogers (1995) diffusion is: "The process by which an innovation is communicated through certain channels over time among the members of a social system". Therefore, an innovator should spread this message by multiple channels to inform as many people as possible who could be interested in this new idea. When this is done properly, one is able to follow the adoption process and can determine if the innovation is rejected or adopted. So, diffusion is the adoption process of the population.;Fisheries bycatch is considered the most serious global threat to marine species, particularly sea turtles. During the past 20 years, the use of different types of fishing gear, especially pelagic longlines (Carranza et al. 2006, Pradhan & Leung 2006, Swimmer et al 2005), have reduced the population of sea turtles and other marine fauna (Peckham et al 2007, Bugoni et al 2008, Alfaro Shingueto et al 2010) due mainly to bycatch (Broderick et al 2006). As a result these species have become subject to intensive conservation efforts.;One of our research questions when examining circle hooks was: which factors influence an individual to try a new fishing gear device? Considerable research indicates that attitudes towards an adoption of change are influenced by a number of community and individual level variables (Rogers 2003). Adoption research methods attempt to predict behavior regarding innovations as perceived by potential adopters by assessing acceptability of innovations (Tango-Lowy & Robertson 2002). This technology was introduced to reduce the consequences of fisheries bycatch.;In order to reduce the incidental capture of sea turtles in commercial fisheries, NOAA has been studying the efficacy of Bycatch Reduction Devices (BRD) such as circle hooks (CH). Alongside other international agencies, NOAA has supported training and outreach efforts to spread knowledge of proper baiting and hooking techniques since the mid-90s. The circle hook NOAA advocates is less likely to be swallowed by sea turtles, reducing the risk of drowning.;As a consequence of those findings, the circle hook was introduced in Latin America to replace traditional J-shaped hooks with the purpose of reducing sea turtle bycatch. To see the effects of this BRD on sea turtles in the artisanal long line fisheries of Ecuador, a joint venture project started in 2003 amongst the following agencies: the Inter-American Tropical Tuna Commission (IATTC); the World Wild Fund (WWF); the Western Pacific Fishery Management Council (WPRFMC); NOAA; the Ocean Conservancy; the Western Pacific Regional Fishery Management Council (WPRFMC); and the Overseas Fisheries Cooperation Foundation of Japan (OFCF Japan). In addition to the support of these agencies, this program received support from the Ecuadorian government and local organizations, such as: the Undersecretariat of Fishery Resources (SRP); the "Programa Nacional de Observadores Pesqueros de Ecuador" (PROBECUADOR); the "Asociacion de Exportadores de Pesca Blanca" (ASOEXPEBLA); the "Federacion Nacional de Cooperativas de Pescadores en el Ecuador" (FENACOPEC); the "Escuela de Pesca del Pacifico Oriental" (EPESPO) of Manta; and the Escuela Superior Politecnica del Litoral (ESPOL). All gave their support and participated in different activities, especially training workshops that educated local fishermen concerning circle hooks and trained fishermen in their use. This program grew to become a region-wide bycatch network and the largest regional artisanal fisheries conservation program in Latin America.;In order to understand the factors influencing an individual to try a new fishing gear, this study augments existing literature on adoption and diffusion, providing evidence of the importance of learning from individual perceptions regarding the adoption of new technologies. The goals of this study are to determine whether the initiative to promote circle hooks and turtle exclusion devices as turtle conservation tools is well perceived by fishers, and also to learn from them if they significantly reduce or do not reduce the capture and mortality of sea turtles.;Although this study has focused on potential issues related to adoption and diffusion of two bycatch reduction devices, there is no doubt that these fishing technologies can be successfully applied as a partial solution to the problem of sea turtle bycatch. Nevertheless, it is through the recognition of potential sociocultural factors and taking steps toward their solution that we can facilitate successful technology transfer wherever and whenever it is needed.;The first chapter attempts to identify perceptions of fishers in the transfer technology that affect an individual's willingness to accept an innovation. Rogers' theoretical framework forms the basis for adoption research and is used to structure a wide variety of studies such as; organizational culture conflict (Reeves-Ellington 1998), resistance to increase regulations in the shrimp fishery (Johnson et al 1998), and coastal development programs (Aswani & Weiant 2004; Pollnac & Pomeroy 2005). Innovation attributes are the perceived properties of an innovation that influence a potential adopters' decision (Rogers 2003). Adoption research assesses perception of innovation attributes by potential adopters to better explain adoption practices or how to better design innovations for project participants. In the context of this study, relationships of the factors of attitudes toward fishing, future perspective and perceptions of recovery activities with willingness to participate, were investigated.;This approach examines individual perceptions and experience with the transfer technology of circle hooks and how fishers affect acceptance of this innovation. Rogers (2003) suggests that adoption of innovations is more likely if a need exists or it is arises among the members of a community. This approach examines individual perceptions and experience with the transfer technology of circle hooks and how fishers affect acceptance of an innovation in general. Rogers (2003) suggests that adoption of innovations is more likely if a need exists or arises. Future perspective is an individual characteristic that can be an indicator of willingness to adopt an innovation (Rogers 2003). The study area is six villages in the Ecuadorian coast that have knowledge of the existence of this new BRD.;Although the effort to transfer circle hook technology has occurred in Ecuador since 2004, there is no doubt that its diffusion process has been slow in most of the fishing towns in this study. Survey results indicate that circle hook adoption in Ecuador is low; only 64 out of 272 informants (23 percent) indicated that they used circle hooks on their boats. Adoption is not easy, especially when the Ecuadorian fishers have spent many years fishing with J hooks. They have time yet to learn and/ or develop adequate techniques to operate with circle hooks, so we can hope that with more time we will see improvements in their catch rates with circle hooks in the future.;Chapter two examines the unintended consequences of technology transfer; specifically, circle hooks in fisheries as a conservation initiative that was intended to curb the accidental capture of sea turtles in Ecuadorian longline fisheries. However, results from this study indicate that BRD can have unintended consequences on other species, specifically sharks. The hypothesis of this study is that the presence of an Ecuadorian shark fishery is a consequence of the most recent Government regulation on sharks coupled with a lucrative international shark fin market may create incentives to misuse this technology and target sharks.;The goal of this analysis is to determine to what extent the promotion of circle hooks as a turtle conservation tool has led to the unintended consequence of circle hooks, which are highly effective in capturing large species such as tuna and swordfish, being used to exploit a regulation that allows fishers to keep any shark caught as bycatch. Ironically, the very device being promoted to conserve the sea turtles is being exploited to catch shark, a regulated species. This study concludes that fishers purposefully use circle hooks rather than j-hooks as a "work around" to catch regulated shark species as bycatch and within the regulations, keep them.;The lucrative trade in shark fins and the incidental established shark fishery in Ecuador provide an incentive to use the circle hook to target sharks. There is no easy solution to this problem. Ecuador, and those at the Inter American Tropical Tuna Commission (IATTC) and World Wildlife Fund (WWF), are in the unenviable position of trying to decide with uncertain science whether to promote a hook that may save sea turtles but put sharks at risk.;Finally, chapter three evaluates fishermen's perceptions regarding the use of the Turtle Excluder Devices (TED), and if this BRD ensures conservation of sea turtles to assure better fisheries management. Actions and decisions regarding any new regulation must be taken with regards to not only scientific information, but also the welfare of all stakeholders involved in one specific fishery. Decisions should not favor one fishery sector or group. Decisions should attempt to favor all the stakeholders as well as the marine resources.;Bycatch reduction is a result of the use of more selective fishing gears such as trawl nets equipped with TEDs. Although this device was, in some way, imposed by the US to enforce its use by the Ecuadorian shrimp vessels and to avoid any ban on shrimp exportation, results of this study indicate that 82% of shrimp vessels use this device, 74% of interviewees obey the use of TEDs because they consider (84%) that it protects sea turtles when they are trapped by the shrimp trawlers, and 72% responded that bycatch has decreased in the past 24 years.;This study concluded that the use of TEDs in Ecuador, although it was imposed in a top-down management manner driven by the interests of government agencies in export markets, its use over the years may have helped sea turtles survive and may have reduced the bycatch of sea turtles.
机译:由于最近二十年来的技术进步,创新有可能彼此紧跟。但是,并非所有创新都是有用的创新,许多生产者通常不知道如何营销他们的新产品。由加布里埃尔·塔德(Gabriel Tarde)(1903)发起的扩散理论首先提出了S形扩散曲线。这项研究之后,直到1943年才进行了一些调查。今年,布莱斯·赖安(Bryce Ryan)和尼尔·格罗斯(Neal Gross)发表了他们关于创新扩散的研究。这导致大量出版物泛滥。后来,罗杰斯(2003)做出了更多的研究,随后还有许多其他人跟随他。当个人或公司提出一个新想法时,他们希望所有潜在用户尽快采用这个想法。创新的传播称为扩散。根据罗杰斯(Rogers,1995)的观点,扩散是:“通过一定的渠道,随着时间的推移,社会系统的各个成员之间传播创新的过程”。因此,创新者应通过多种渠道传播此信息,以使尽可能多的人对该新想法感兴趣。适当地做到这一点,就可以遵循采用过程,并可以确定创新是被拒绝还是被采用。因此,扩散是种群的采用过程。渔业兼捕被认为是对海洋物种特别是海龟的最严重的全球威胁。在过去的20年中,使用不同类型的渔具,尤其是中上延绳钓(Carranza等,2006; Pradhan&Leung,2006; Swimmer等,2005),减少了海龟和其他海洋动物的数量(Peckham等,2000)。 (2007),Bugoni等(2008),Alfaro Shingueto等(2010)主要归功于兼捕(Broderick等2006)。结果,这些物种已成为集约化保护工作的重点。;当检查圆钩时,我们的研究问题之一是:哪些因素会影响个人尝试新的渔具装置?大量研究表明,对采用变更的态度受许多社区和个人层面变量的影响(Rogers 2003)。采用研究方法试图通过评估创新的可接受性来预测潜在采用者所感知的创新行为(Tango-Lowy&Robertson 2002)。引入该技术是为了减少渔业兼捕的后果。为了减少商业渔业中海龟的偶然捕获,NOAA一直在研究诸如环钩(CH)的兼捕减少装置(BRD)的功效。自90年代中期以来,NOAA与其他国际机构一道支持培训和外展工作,以传播有关适当诱饵和钩钩技术的知识。 NOAA倡导者使用的圆形鱼钩不太可能被海龟吞下,从而降低了溺水的风险。由于这些发现,拉丁美洲引入了圆形鱼钩以取代传统的J形鱼钩,以减少海龟的发生。乌龟兼捕。为了了解这种BRD对厄瓜多尔手工长线渔业中海龟的影响,2003年启动了以下机构之间的合资项目:美洲热带金枪鱼委员会(IATTC);世界野生基金会(WWF);西太平洋渔业管理理事会(WPRFMC); NOAA;海洋管理;西太平洋区域渔业管理理事会(WPRFMC);日本海外渔业合作基金会(OFCF Japan)。除了这些机构的支持之外,该计划还得到了厄瓜多尔政府和地方组织的支持,例如:渔业资源秘书处(SRP); “厄瓜多尔佩斯克斯罗斯国立观测计划”(PROBECUADOR); “佩斯卡布兰卡出口协会”(ASOEXPEBLA);厄瓜多尔佩斯卡多斯国立合作社(FENACOPEC);曼塔(Manta)的“东方太平洋太平洋大道”(EPESPO);和Escuela Superior Politecnica del Litoral(ESPOL)。所有人都给予了支持并参加了各种活动,特别是培训讲习班,对当地渔民进行了圈钩的教育,并培训了渔民的使用方法。该计划已发展成为拉丁美洲范围内的兼捕网和最大的区域手工渔业保护计划。;为了了解影响个人尝试新渔具的因素,本研究增加了有关采用和扩散的现有文献,提供证据证明从个人对采用新技术的看法中学习的重要性。这项研究的目的是确定渔民是否很好地了解了将圆钩和乌龟排除装置作为乌龟养护工具的举措,并从中学习它们是否会显着降低或不降低海龟的捕获率和死亡率。尽管这项研究的重点是与采用和扩散两种兼捕减少装置有关的潜在问题,但毫无疑问,这些捕捞活动这些技术可以成功地部分解决海龟兼捕问题。然而,正是通过认识到潜在的社会文化因素并采取措施解决问题,我们才能在需要的地方和任何时候促进成功的技术转让。第一章试图确定影响个人意愿的渔民对转让技术的看法。接受创新。罗杰斯的理论框架构成了采用研究的基础,并被用于构建各种研究,例如组织文化冲突(Reeves-Ellington 1998),对虾渔业增加法规的抵制(Johnson等1998)以及沿海开发计划(Aswani&Weiant 2004; Pollnac&Pomeroy 2005)。创新属性是影响潜在采用者决策的创新感知属性(Rogers 2003)。采用研究评估潜在采用者对创新属性的感知,以更好地解释采用实践或如何更好地为项目参与者设计创新。在本研究的背景下,研究了对钓鱼态度,未来前景和恢复活动的看法与参与意愿的因素之间的关系。;这种方法研究了个体对圈钩转移技术的看法和经验以及渔民如何影响接受这项创新。罗杰斯(2003)建议,如果存在需求或社区成员中出现需求,则采用创新的可能性更大。该方法检验了个人对圆钩转移技术的看法和经验,以及渔民总体上如何影响对创新的接受。罗杰斯(2003)建议,如果存在或出现需求,采用创新的可能性就更大。未来的观点是个人的特征,可以表明愿意采用创新的方式(Rogers 2003)。研究区域是厄瓜多尔沿岸的六个村庄,他们都知道这种新的BRD的存在。尽管厄瓜多尔自2004年以来就一直在努力转移圆钩技术,但毫无疑问,在大多数情况下,其扩散过程一直很缓慢本研究中的渔镇。调查结果表明,厄瓜多尔采用圆钩的比例很低。 272名被调查者中,只有64名(占23%)表示他们在船上使用了圆形钩。领养并不容易,尤其是当厄瓜多尔的渔民用J钩钓鱼多年时。他们还没有时间学习和/或开发足够的技术来使用圆钩,因此我们可以希望,随着时间的推移,我们将来会看到圆钩的捕获率有所提高。;第二章探讨了技术的意外后果传递;具体来说,在渔业中圈钩是一项保护举措,旨在遏制厄瓜多尔延绳钓渔业中海龟的意外捕获。但是,这项研究的结果表明,BRD可能会对其他物种,特别是鲨鱼产生意想不到的后果。这项研究的假设是,厄瓜多尔鲨鱼渔业的存在是政府对鲨鱼的最新规定加上有利可图的国际鱼翅市场的结果,可能会诱使人们滥用该技术并瞄准鲨鱼。是为了确定将圈钩作为龟类保护工具的推广在多大程度上导致了圈钩的意外后果,圈钩在捕获金枪鱼和箭鱼等大型物种方面非常有效,可用于制定一项允许渔民进行捕捞的法规保留任何鲨鱼作为兼捕物。具有讽刺意味的是,正被推广用来保护海龟的装置正被用来捕捞鲨鱼,这是一种受管制的物种。这项研究得出的结论是,渔民有意使用圆钩而不是j钩作为“规避”措施,以捕捞受监管的鲨鱼作为兼捕物,并在规定范围内,将其保留。鼓励使用圆钩瞄准鲨鱼。这个问题没有简单的解决方案。厄瓜多尔,以及美洲热带金枪鱼委员会(IATTC)和世界野生动物基金会(WWF)的成员,都处于令人羡慕的地位,试图以不确定的科学来决定是否推广一种可以挽救海龟但将鲨鱼置于危险之中的钩子。 ;最后,第三章评估了渔民对使用Turtle Excluder设备(TED)的看法,以及该BRD是否确保保护海龟以确保更好的渔业管理。关于任何新法规的行动和决定,不仅应涉及科学信息,而且还应涉及某一特定渔业的所有利益相关者的福利。决定不应偏向一个渔业部门或集团。决策应尝试使所有利益相关者以及海洋资源受益。减少渔获是由于使用了更具选择性的渔具,例如配备了TEDs的拖网。尽管该设备是美国以某种方式强加给厄瓜多尔虾船强制使用并避免禁止虾出口的任何禁令,但这项研究的结果表明,有82%的虾船使用此设备,有74%的受访者遵循TEDs的使用,因为他们认为(84%)当虾拖网捕捞海龟时,它可以保护海龟; 72%的受访者回答说,过去24年来副渔获物有所减少。厄瓜多尔虽然受到政府机构在出口市场中利益的驱使而采用自上而下的管理方式,但多年来的使用可能有助于海龟生存,并可能减少了海龟的副渔获物。

著录项

  • 作者

    Gaibor, Nikita.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Rhode Island.;

  • 授予单位 University of Rhode Island.;
  • 学科 Social research.;Environmental management.;Conservation biology.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2016
  • 页码 165 p.
  • 总页数 165
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:47:05

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号