首页> 外文学位 >文献详情
【24h】

Husserl, Heidegger and the phenomenology of logic (Edmund Husserl, Martin Heidegger).

机译:胡塞尔,海德格尔与逻辑现象学(埃德蒙·胡塞尔,马丁·海德格尔)。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This dissertation deals with the ways in which Husserl and Heidegger as phenomenologists are guided by the commitment to a logical theory of science. It considers the internal relationship between, respectively, Husserlian and Heideggerian phenomenology and a conception of logic that would link phenomenological philosophy of logic to the contemporary definition of this discipline. The dramatic transition in the modern history of logic is played out explicitly in Husserl's conception of formal theory of science, which hinges on his idea of formal ontology, and implicitly in Heidegger's conception of a fundamental ontology that would ultimately engender a new idea of logic. Their respective conceptions of formal and fundamental ontology intersect in the way they both understand “world” as phenomenological pre-condition for any higher level meaning constitution. The synthetic structure of worldly experience serves as protological basis for any formal- or natural-linguistic interpretation of scientific activity. In short, it is the way that Husserl and Heidegger understand the relationship between logic and ontology that allows them to work within the philosophical presuppositions of modern logic and eventually to generate a critique that points beyond phenomenology to this tradition—the contemporary history of logic from meta-mathematics to philosophy of language.; Beginning with a methodological discussion of phenomenological meaning-investigation, i.e. Besinnung, the dissertation then proceeds from Husserl's initial engagement with formal logic and mathematics up to a conception of logic that would eventually make possible a dialogue between Heidegger and more recent philosophy of language. Between Husserl and Heidegger, it is the very object of logic that is at stake, i.e. whether logic is concerned primarily with the interpretation of formal-theoretical systems or with the analysis of discourse understood in terms of natural language. Yet reading Husserl and Heidegger through the phenomenology of logic also sketches a possibility for reading them together that has gone largely unexplored. Despite the ways in which their respective projects in phenomenology are often viewed as incommensurable, their phenomenology of logic leads back to a common commitment to a proto-logical conception of meaning based in principles of passive constitution.
机译:本论文探讨了胡塞尔和海德格尔作为现象学家的方法是对科学逻辑理论的承诺所指导的。它考虑了胡塞尔和海德格尔现象学之间的内部关系,以及将逻辑现象学逻辑哲学与该学科的当代定义联系起来的逻辑概念。现代逻辑史上的戏剧性转变明确地体现在胡塞尔的形式科学理论观中,后者取决于他的形式本体论观念,而隐含地存在于海德格尔的基本本体论观念中,后者最终产生了一种新的逻辑观念。他们各自的形式本体论和基本本体论的概念以它们都将“世界”理解为任何更高层次的意义构成的现象学前提的方式相交。世俗经验的综合结构为科学活动的任何形式或自然语言解释提供了语言学基础。简而言之,正是胡塞尔和海德格尔理解逻辑与本体之间的关系的方式,使他们得以在现代逻辑的哲学前提下工作,并最终产生了一种超越现象学的批评,指向这种传统。语言哲学的元数学。从对现象学意义调查的方法论讨论(即<斜体> Besinnung )开始,然后从胡塞尔对形式逻辑和数学的最初介入开始,一直到逻辑概念,最终使海德格尔与最近的语言哲学。在胡塞尔与海德格尔之间,逻辑的真正对象受到威胁,即逻辑是主要关注形式理论系统的解释还是关系到以自然语言理解的话语分析。然而,通过逻辑现象学来阅读胡塞尔和海德格尔,也勾勒出了一起阅读它们的可能性,这种可能性在很大程度上尚待探索。尽管他们各自的现象学计划常常被认为是不可估量的,但是他们的逻辑现象学却导致人们对基于被动构成原则的意义的原逻辑概念有了共同的承诺。

著录项

  • 作者

    Calandrella, Derrick Roy.;

  • 作者单位

    The Pennsylvania State University.;

  • 授予单位 The Pennsylvania State University.;
  • 学科 Philosophy.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2001
  • 页码 319 p.
  • 总页数 319
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 B0;
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:47:06

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号