首页> 外文学位 >The essence of causation.
【24h】

The essence of causation.

机译:因果关系的本质。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

My intention is to prove that causation is a feature of the world requiring the existence of objects and powers. I will begin by opposing the most prevalent contemporary accounts of causation, including regularity views and accounts that view causation as a relation between events. These theories will be shown to be lacking in their ability to accurately capture the causal features of our world. I will then produce a positive and systematic metaphysical account of causation -- one that relies upon the powers of objects. My research is heavily influenced by the work of C. B. Martin, Stephen Mumford, George Molnar, and Neil Williams.;The work defends four central theses related to causation. The first of these is singularism, the view that the ontological grounds for a singular causal instance depend solely on features of the particulars involved in the causal relation. The second thesis is that any good theory of causation ought to support causal necessitation. The third central thesis, and from where the title of this work gets its name, is the idea that causation in name is not causation in reality. Most analyses of causation have failed precisely because the nominal essence of causation was taken to be the real essence of causation. The final piece of the project sheds light on how powers stand in relation to causes and effects. The fourth thesis is that the real essence of causation is found in the complex interaction of many manifesting powers.;Singularism is to be contrasted with views that see the grounds of the singular causal relation as something "outside" the causal instance. Most often, the opposing view point is one that posits laws or regularities as the ultimate grounds for singular causation. On this view, the singular causal sequence requires some covering law or regularity in order to be causal. The view proposed in this work however, is that causal instances are causal in virtue of the particular features of the singular causal instance alone. The ultimate grounds of causation will not be found above, but rather below. The truthmaker for all true causal claims will be power properties, and power properties, I will argue, are intrinsic to the singular causal relation.;Causal necessitation can be cashed out in number of different ways. For me, causal necessitation ought to capture what we mean by physical necessity. To use Mackie's phrasing, causation should be the cement that holds the universe together. I will go along with Hume in defining causal necessitation as a necessary connection between distinct existents. I will diverge from Hume in stating that these necessary connections (abbreviated NCDE) do exist. Moreover, it will be shown that the power account of causation captures this unique kind of physical necessity in ways that other theories of causation cannot.;The dissertation proposes a distinction between the nominal essence of causation and the real essence of causation. The aim of this project is to characterize the real essence of causation, or causation de re. The proposal here is that while nominal causation can take many forms, the real essence of causation involves powers and their attendant manifestations. This distinction will be further evidenced by the inability of nominal causal instances to capture NCDE. Our causal talk may aim at or point toward real causation, but more often than not, nominal causation will turn out to not be causation de re.;An ontology of powers will also be defended in this dissertation. The work views all properties as being powers. Even the most paradigmatic putative categorical properties will be shown to be powers. Powers, it will be argued, are identified by their directedness, independence, and intrinsicality. All three aspects of powers will be discussed and defended.;Ultimately, this dissertation argues for a robust power account of real causation. All true causal claims will have truthmakers. The truthmakers for these claims will most often be a complex interaction of the contributions of many manifesting powers combining in such a way so as to produce an effect. Furthermore, the real essence of causation will be found in the complex interaction of powers and the unique manifestations toward which they are directed.
机译:我的目的是证明因果关系是需要存在物体和力量的世界的特征。我将首先反对当代最普遍的因果关系说明,包括规律性视图和将因果关系视为事件之间关系的说明。这些理论将被证明缺乏准确把握我们世界因果特征的能力。然后,我将对因果关系做出积极而系统的形而上学解释-依赖于对象的力量。我的研究在很大程度上受到C. B. Martin,Stephen Mumford,George Molnar和Neil Williams著作的影响。该著作捍卫了与因果关系有关的四个核心论点。其中第一个是奇异主义,即奇异因果实例的本体论依据仅取决于因果关系中所涉及细节的特征。第二个论点是,任何因果关系的好的理论都应支持因果关系的必要性。第三个中心论点是该作品的名称从何而来,其名称从何而来,即名称中的因果关系并非现实中的因果关系。因果关系的大多数分析都失败了,因为因果关系的名义本质被视为因果关系的真正本质。该项目的最后一部分阐明了权力与因果关系的立场。第四个论点是,因果关系的真正实质是在许多表现力的复杂相互作用中找到的。奇异主义与将奇异因果关系的依据视为因果关系实例“之外”的观点形成对比。通常,相反的观点是将法律或规律性视为唯一因果关系的最终依据。根据这种观点,奇异因果序列需要一定的覆盖律或规律性才能成为因果关系。然而,在这项工作中提出的观点是,因果实例是因果的,这仅是由于单个因果实例的特殊特征。因果关系的最终依据不在上面,而是在下面。所有真正因果主张的真理制造者将是权力属性,而权力属性是奇异因果关系所固有的。因果必然性可以通过多种不同方式兑现。对我而言,因果必要性应该抓住我们所指的物质必要性。要使用Mackie的措辞,因果关系应该是将宇宙保持在一起的水泥。我将与休ume一起将因果必要性定义为不同存在之间的必要联系。在说明这些必要的连接(简称NCDE)确实存在时,我将与休ume(Hume)有所不同。而且,将证明因果关系的权力账户以其他因果关系理论所无法捕捉的方式捕获了这种独特的物理必要性。;论文提出了因果关系的名义本质与因果关系的实质之间的区别。该项目的目的是表征因果关系或因果关系的真正本质。这里的建议是,尽管名义因果关系可以采取多种形式,但因果关系的真正实质涉及权力及其伴随的表现形式。这种区别将由名义因果实例无法捕获NCDE进一步证明。我们的因果关系也许是针对或指向真正的因果关系,但通常,名义因果关系并不是真正的因果关系。在本文中,也将捍卫权力的本体。该作品将所有属性视为力量。甚至最典型的假定分类属性也将显示为幂。将会争论的是,权力是由其定向性,独立性和内在性来确定的。权力的所有三个方面都将进行讨论和辩护。最终,本文提出了对因果关系的强有力的权力解释。所有真正的因果主张都会有真理的造物主。这些主张的真理制造者通常是许多表现力的贡献的复杂相互作用,以这种方式结合起来才能产生效果。此外,因果关系的真正实质将在权力的复杂相互作用和权力所针对的独特表现形式中找到。

著录项

  • 作者

    Hartnett, Ryan Patrick.;

  • 作者单位

    State University of New York at Buffalo.;

  • 授予单位 State University of New York at Buffalo.;
  • 学科 Metaphysics.;Philosophy of Science.;Philosophy.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2010
  • 页码 187 p.
  • 总页数 187
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:36:46

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号