首页> 外文学位 >The balanced scorecard and decision strategies: What roles do outcome effects, framing biases and explicit weights play in the balancing act?
【24h】

The balanced scorecard and decision strategies: What roles do outcome effects, framing biases and explicit weights play in the balancing act?

机译:平衡计分卡和决策策略:在平衡行为中,结果效果,成帧偏见和明确的权重起什么作用?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The Balanced Scorecard is a managerial accounting tool that aligns a company's strategy by balancing both financial and nonfinancial performance measures in decision making. The purpose of this dissertation is to examine whether outcome effects and framing biases prevent this balance and if weights on the financial and nonfinancial criteria improve decision making. I study how these variables impact decision strategies using a previously-derived index. This index measures the level of compensatory processing for each subject.; In the experiment, seventy-eight MBA students complete one practice case and two experimental cases: a control case and a treatments case. In the treatments case, I manipulate whether a financial or nonfinancial performance category is above target (favorable outcome) or below target (unfavorable outcome). I also present explicit weights to half of the participants. I find evidence of outcome and framing effects in Balanced Scorecard decisions, especially in the unfavorable financial treatment conditions. Subjects in unfavorable financial treatments tend to exhibit significantly lower levels of compensatory processing than subjects in the favorable financial condition. Subjects in nonfinancial favorable and unfavorable outcomes do not exhibit different levels of compensatory processing.; I also discover that subjects in nonfinancial treatment conditions who also receive weights employ very low levels of compensatory processing. This is an important finding since organizations currently use weights in Balanced Scorecard administration and academic research alludes to the idea that explicit weights improve decision, when actually, my results suggest the opposite.; These results have implications for accounting and information processing research as well as accounting practitioners and organizations who have implemented or will implement the Balanced Scorecard. To my knowledge, I am the first to show that favorable and unfavorable outcomes interact with the processing of financial information and the first to show how effectively the previously-derived index can be in decision making research. Moreover, because numerous U.S. and foreign firms use the Balanced Scorecard, knowing how decision makers react to this managerial tool can help improve its effectiveness.
机译:平衡计分卡是一种管理会计工具,通过平衡决策中的财务和非财务绩效指标来调整公司战略。本文的目的是检验结果影响和框架偏差是否会阻止这种平衡,以及财务和非财务标准的权重是否可以改善决策。我使用先前得出的索引研究这些变量如何影响决策策略。该指数衡量每个主题的补偿处理水平。在该实验中,七十八名MBA学生完成了一个实践案例和两个实验案例:一个对照案例和一个治疗案例。在治疗情况下,我操纵财务或非财务绩效类别是高于目标(有利结果)还是低于目标(不利结果)。我还向一半的参与者展示了明确的权重。我在“平衡计分卡”决策中发现了结果和框架效应的证据,尤其是在不利的财务处理条件下。处于不利财务状况的受试者倾向于表现出比处于有利财务状况中的受试者明显更低的代偿加工水平。具有非财务有利和不利结果的受试者没有表现出不同水平的补偿性处理。我还发现,在非金融治疗条件下也能承受体重的受试者,其代偿过程水平非常低。这是一个重要发现,因为组织当前在“平衡计分卡”管理中使用权重,而学术研究则暗示了明确的权重可以改善决策的想法,而实际上,我的结果却相反。这些结果对会计和信息处理研究以及已实施或将要实施平衡计分卡的会计从业人员和组织产生影响。据我所知,我是第一个表明有利和不利结果与财务信息处理相互作用的人,并且第一个表明先前得出的索引可以在决策研究中发挥多大作用。此外,由于许多美国和外国公司都使用平衡计分卡,因此了解决策者如何对这种管理工具做出反应可以帮助提高其有效性。

著录项

  • 作者

    Haywood, Mary Elizabeth.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Georgia.;

  • 授予单位 University of Georgia.;
  • 学科 Business Administration Accounting.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2001
  • 页码 134 p.
  • 总页数 134
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 财务管理、经济核算;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号