首页> 外文学位 >The fourfold and technology: Heidegger's thinking of limit.
【24h】

The fourfold and technology: Heidegger's thinking of limit.

机译:技术的四重:海德格尔的极限思想。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

In this work, I attempt a four-part task: (1) to explicate Heidegger's notion of the Fourfold, (2) to show its necessary relation to technology, (3) to think the limit that separates these, and (4) to show how this constellation of the Fourfold and technology escapes from the "metaphysics of presence" with which Heidegger has been charged.1. The Fourfold is the belonging together of Earth, Sky, Mortals, and Divinities. Heidegger inherits the components from Holderlin, but transforms then in his thought. The gathering of these four goes to make up the presencing of a singular and delimited entity (a "thing"). Such a thing exists as unique and irreplaceable.2. This singular mode of presence is only understandable against the background of limitless technological circulation. Influenced by Ernst Junger, Heidegger sees technology as setting into place a world (better, "unworld") of instantaneous replacement and sameness. The name for this manner of replaceable presence is "Bestand ."3. The unworld of technology is no simple "opposite" to the Fourfold, however. Rather the two modes of presence belong together. Heidegger repeatedly emphasizes how there can never be a complete loss of world in the enframing of technology. Conversely, the Fourfold is never free of the Bestand. A play of revelation and concealment is operative here and intimately related to Heidegger's new notion of essence. I examine this intricate and intimate co-belonging of technology and the Fourfold.4. This interpretation is used to counter the charge that Heidegger would think in terms of metaphysical presence, i.e., in terms of complete, self-present, and pure presence. Such a charge is leveled in the early work of Jacques Derrida. I show that Heidegger's thinking is already a thought of the trace. Since there is consequently no total presence or absence for Heidegger (no metaphysical version of presence), there can be no simple overcoming of metaphysics (Uberwindung) either. Metaphysics cannot be so easily left behind, but must undergo a transformation ( Verwindung). This is nothing more than a recognition of the trace and its place at the limit of singular, finite existence.The first chapter treats the circulation of technology, the remaining four address in series the elements of the Fourfold (Earth, Sky, Mortals, and Divinities).
机译:在这项工作中,我尝试了一个四部分的任务:(1)阐明海德格尔的“四重”概念,(2)展示其与技术的必要关系,(3)考虑将这些分开的极限,以及(4)展示这种“四重”和技术的星座是如何摆脱海德格尔被指控的“存在的形而上学”的。1。四重是地球,天空,人与神的归属。海德格尔从霍德林继承了组成部分,但随后改变了他的思想。这四者的集合构成了一个单一且定界的实体(“事物”)的存在。这样的事情是独特而不可替代的。2。只有在无限技术循环的背景下才能理解这种奇异的存在方式。在恩斯特·荣格(Ernst Junger)的影响下,海德格尔将技术视为建立了一个瞬间替代和相同的世界(更好的是“非世界”)。这种可替换状态的显示方式的名称为“ Bestand。”。然而,技术的世界并不简单。相反,这两种存在方式是在一起的。海德格尔反复强调,在技术发展中,世界永远不会完全丧失。相反,四重奏永远不会摆脱Bestand。启示和隐蔽的戏剧在这里是有效的,并且与海德格尔的新的本质观念密切相关。我考察了技术与四重关系的这种错综复杂的联系。4。这种解释用来抵消海德格尔在形而上学的存在,即完全的,自我存在的和纯粹的存在方面的思考。雅克·德里达(Jacques Derrida)的早期工作对这种指控进行了评估。我证明海德格尔的思想已经是一种痕迹。因此,由于海德格尔不存在或不存在(不存在的形而上学形式)​​,因此也不可能简单地克服形而上学(Uberwindung)。形而上学不能轻易地被抛在后面,而必须经历一个转变(Verwindung)。这无非是对痕迹及其在单数有限存在极限中的位置的认识。第一章讨论技术的循环,其余四个部分依次论述“四重”的元素(地球,天空,凡人和神灵)。

著录项

  • 作者

    Mitchell, Andrew John.;

  • 作者单位

    State University of New York at Stony Brook.;

  • 授予单位 State University of New York at Stony Brook.;
  • 学科 Philosophy.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2001
  • 页码 340 p.
  • 总页数 340
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:47:02

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号