首页> 外文学位 >Stew of discontent: Middle class Americans' economic populism.
【24h】

Stew of discontent: Middle class Americans' economic populism.

机译:不满的炖汤:中产阶级美国人的经济民粹主义。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This dissertation generates possible explanations for conflicting claims in the literature on the economic populist sentiment (or incipient class consciousness) of the contemporary American middle class. It asserts that social and political analysts have depicted the middle class as either: (1) basically accepting the socioeconomic status quo, (2) substantially discontent with growing class inequality and increasingly ready to resist it, or (3) containing a simple conglomeration of both inclinations.; The study analyzes in-depth interviews with eighteen ordinary middle class individuals from central Connecticut. It finds that economic populist sentiment can be highly complex---varied and subtle in its form, potency, importance, origin and evolution. It suggests that partial or distorted discernment of such complexity well could have resulted in all three competing images of the middle class. It proposes that particular methodological mistakes and political preconceptions could have limited or skewed analysts' perceptions. It posits that deeper causes of perceptual distortion may include methodological ignorance and dogmatism; excessive political idealism, cynicism and partisanship; historical determinism and ambiguity; and intellectuals' cultural biases.; The study concludes by advocating greater awareness of these pitfalls and the adoption of specific countervailing intellectual practices. It describes how such adjustments could not only improve the analysis of class consciousness but also aid the politics of class equalization.
机译:本文为当代美国中产阶级的经济民粹主义情绪(或初期阶级意识)的文献中的矛盾主张提供了可能的解释。它断言,社会和政治分析家将中产阶级描述为:(1)基本上接受社会经济现状;(2)对阶级不平等现象日益严重的不满,并日益准备好抵抗它;或者(3)包含一个简单的集团两种倾向。该研究分析了对来自康涅狄格州中部的18名普通中产阶级人士的深度访谈。研究发现,经济民粹主义情绪可能非常复杂-在形式,效力,重要性,起源和演变上各不相同。它表明,对这种复杂性的部分或扭曲的认识可能已经导致了中产阶级的所有三个竞争形象。它提出,特定的方法错误和政治偏见可能会限制或歪曲分析师的看法。它认为,更深层的知觉失真原因可能包括方法论上的无知和教条主义。过分的政治理想主义,玩世不恭和党派统治;历史确定性和模糊性;和知识分子的文化偏见。该研究的结论是提倡对这些陷阱的更多认识,并采取特殊的反补贴知识实践。它描述了这种调整如何不仅可以改善对阶级意识的分析,而且可以帮助阶级平等的政治。

著录项

  • 作者

    Martin, Jonathan H.;

  • 作者单位

    Brandeis University.;

  • 授予单位 Brandeis University.;
  • 学科 American Studies.; Sociology Social Structure and Development.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2001
  • 页码 360 p.
  • 总页数 360
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 社会结构和社会关系;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号