首页> 外文学位 >Trapped in language: Nation, space, and subject in Hebrew literature, Hebrew literary criticism, and Jewish national ideologies.
【24h】

Trapped in language: Nation, space, and subject in Hebrew literature, Hebrew literary criticism, and Jewish national ideologies.

机译:语言被困:希伯来文学,希伯来文学批评和犹太民族意识形态中的民族,空间和主题。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This dissertation is a study of the rhetorical interaction between Hebrew literature, Hebrew literary criticism, and Zionist political writings. Focusing on key terms of Zionist discourses, the dissertation explores formal contradictions within the Zionist subject through a close reading not only of literary but of critical and ideological texts as well. Rather than attempting to construct historical narratives of modern Hebrew literature, Hebrew criticism, and Zionist discourses, I sample three "moments" within the history of the Jewish national discourses. The first moment roughly corresponds with the earliest years of an organized Jewish national movement, from the writing of Ahad Ha-Am in the late 1890s to the literary criticism of Y. H. Brenner in the early 1910s, with Moshe Smilansky's short story "Khawaja Nazar" completing the triangle. The three terms at the focus of my discussion are territory, language, and truth. The second moment corresponds to the high point in the implementation of Zionist discourses in Palestine from the early 1920 to the establishment of the State of Israel in the late 1940s. In the second chapter I thus read Moshe Shamir's novel He Walked in the Fields alongside the ideological essays of David Ben-Gurion and Meir Ya'ari, and the literary criticism of such critics as David Kna'ani, Shelomo Zemach, and Gershon Shaked. In my readings, I focus on the articulation of history and myth as conflicting, yet complementary terms. The last moment corresponds to the decline of Social-Zionist discourses from the late 1960s on. Thus, in Chapter 3 I examine the ideological essays of A. B. Yehoshua and Amos Oz, in Chapter 4 Ya'akov Shabtai's novel Past Continuous, and in Chapter 5 the critical project of Dan Miron. In these chapters I examine the formation of identity as a site of anxiety that corresponds to the political decline of the Labor Movement as well as to the challenge of the Palestinian presence in the Occupied Territories. The juxtaposition of the three "modes of discourse" uncovers contradictory trends at the center of some of the seemingly strictest ideological expressions and further underscores the crucial role literary criticism plays in the construction of national space, culture and subject.
机译:本文研究了希伯来文学,希伯来文学批评和犹太复国主义政治著作之间的修辞互动。本文着眼于犹太复国主义话语的关键术语,通过仔细阅读文学作品以及批判性和意识形态文本,探索了犹太复国主义主题内的形式矛盾。我没有尝试构建现代希伯来文学,希伯来批评和犹太复国主义话语的历史叙事,而是在犹太民族话语历史中取样了三个“时刻”。第一刻大致与有组织的犹太民族运动的最早年份相对应,从1890年代后期的Ahad Ha-Am的写作到1910年代初期的YH Brenner的文学批评,以及Moshe Smilansky的短篇小说“ Khawaja Nazar”的完成三角形。我讨论的重点是领土,语言和真理这三个术语。第二个时刻与从1920年代初到1940年代后期建立以色列国在巴勒斯坦实施犹太复国主义话语的最高点相对应。因此,在第二章中,我阅读了摩西·沙米尔(Moshe Shamir)的小说《他在田野里走了》,以及戴维·本古里安(David Ben-Gurion)和迈尔·亚阿里(Meir Ya'ari)的思想论文,以及戴维·纳纳尼(David Kna'ani),谢洛莫·泽马赫(Shelomo Zemach)和格申·谢克(Gershon Shaked)等批评家的文学评论。在我的阅读中,我将历史和神话的表述重点放在相互矛盾但又相互补充的术语上。最后时刻与1960年代后期以来社会犹太复国主义话语的衰落相对应。因此,在第3章中,我考察了A. B. Yehoshua和Amos Oz的思想论文,在第4章中,讨论了Ya'akov Shabtai的小说《过去的连续性》,在第5章中,研究了丹·米隆(Dan Miron)的批评性计划。在这些章节中,我将探讨身份的形成,这是与工运的政治衰落以及巴勒斯坦人在被占领土上存在的挑战相对应的焦虑点。三种“话语模式”的并置揭示了一些看似最严格的意识形态表达中心的矛盾趋势,并进一步强调了文学批评在国家空间,文化和主题建设中的关键作用。

著录项

  • 作者

    Ginsburg, Shai Pessah.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Michigan.;

  • 授予单位 University of Michigan.;
  • 学科 Literature Comparative.;Literature Middle Eastern.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2001
  • 页码 517 p.
  • 总页数 517
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:46:50

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号