首页> 外文学位 >Critical eating: Genetically engineered foods in international relations. Designing international bodies on risk management in evolving science and technology with global impact.
【24h】

Critical eating: Genetically engineered foods in international relations. Designing international bodies on risk management in evolving science and technology with global impact.

机译:关键饮食:国际关系中的转基因食品。在国际影响力不断发展的科学技术领域设计国际风险管理机构。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This thesis aims at providing insights on how to set up and design international decision-making bodies in evolving science and technology with global impact. It addresses the institutional side of growing concerns about participatory democracy while using the current debate over genetically engineered foods as means of exploring possible options.; The analysis focuses on how policy-advice on genetically engineered foods is structured, both on the domestic and international levels. Domestic efforts in Canada, the USA, and Europe are analyzed together with alternative instruments such as Consensus Conferences. For the international level, the FAO/WHO Codex Alimentarius, the U.S.-EU Consultative Forum, and the Biosafety Protocol are analyzed in depth. Since setting up and designing decision-making bodies in evolving science and technology has already been practiced on several issues and in various ways, this thesis also draws on past significant experiences with such bodies. Finally, this thesis identifies the crucial features of international bodies on risk management in evolving science and technology and applies the findings on the design of a future international panel on genetically engineered foods. Although the focus is on the issue of genetically engineered foods, the findings may be of broader application and be of value in future efforts to cope with issues of science, high technology, civil society and development within a globalizing, but nevertheless pluralistic and multicultural, world.
机译:本文旨在就如何建立和设计具有全球影响力的科学和技术发展的国际决策机构提供见解。它解决了人们对参与式民主日益增长的关注的制度方面,同时利用关于遗传工程食品的当前辩论作为探索可能选择的手段。分析的重点是在国内和国际层面上如何构建有关基因工程食品的政策建议。分析了加拿大,美国和欧洲的国内努力以及共识会议等替代工具。在国际一级,对粮农组织/世卫组织食品法典,美国-欧盟协商论坛和《生物安全议定书》进行了深入分析。由于已经在若干问题上以各种方式实践了建立和设计不断发展的科学技术决策机构,因此,本文还借鉴了过去在此​​类机构中的重要经验。最后,本文确定了国际风险管理机构在科学技术发展中的关键特征,并将这些发现应用于未来的国际基因工程食品专家组的设计。尽管重点放在转基因食品上,但这一发现可能具有更广泛的应用,并在未来努力应对全球化,但仍是多元和多元文化的科学,高科技,公民社会和发展问题方面具有重要价值,世界。

著录项

  • 作者

    Heumuller, Dirk Walter.;

  • 作者单位

    Stanford University.;

  • 授予单位 Stanford University.;
  • 学科 Law.; Political Science International Law and Relations.; Agriculture General.
  • 学位 J.S.D.
  • 年度 2001
  • 页码 198 p.
  • 总页数 198
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 法律;国际法;农学(农艺学);
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:46:50

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号