首页> 外文学位 >The Straits question revisited: Legal and policy dimensions of the current dispute over the Straits of Istanbul, Chanakkale, and the Sea of Marmara (Turkey).
【24h】

The Straits question revisited: Legal and policy dimensions of the current dispute over the Straits of Istanbul, Chanakkale, and the Sea of Marmara (Turkey).

机译:重新讨论了海峡问题:当前有关伊斯坦布尔海峡,查纳卡莱海峡和马尔马拉海(土耳其)的争端的法律和政策方面。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The purpose of this dissertation work is to examine the changes in the navigation regime of the Straits of Istanbul, Chanakkale, and the Sea of Marmara (commonly known as the Bosphorus and the Dardanelles) initiated in the last decade of the 20th century and the dispute brought about by these changes. Focused exclusively on the technical aspects of the navigation in the Straits, the dispute-resolution efforts of the International Maritime Organization (IMO) have succeeded in avoiding open conflict and buying time, but have failed to achieve a lasting resolution. Driven by the belief that an adequate understanding of all facets of the dispute is paramount for its neutralization, this work has attempted to unravel the intricate web of technical, legal, economic, and security factors woven in the most recent dispute over the Straits.; To this end, the Straits' navigation and geopolitical situation are laid out, followed by a review and analysis of the elements of the existing international legal regime that governs them. Particular attention is given to the implications of UNCLOS and its treatment of straits used for international navigation governed by long-standing international conventions. A detailed synopsis of the dispute and the IMO role in it is offered and the Turkish and the IMO regulations are reviewed for their consistency with existing international law. Elaborating on the modalities and ramifications of the Turkish and the IMO regulatory efforts, this work has identified the restoration of the integrity of the 1936 Montreux Convention as key to successfully bridging the safety, environmental, economic, and geopolitical interests of all involved parties. A procedural framework is suggested to allow for the Convention's security provisions to be aligned with contemporary environmental and navigation safety law without being unduly compromised.
机译:本论文的目的是研究20世纪最后十年发起的伊斯坦布尔海峡,恰纳卡莱海峡和马尔马拉海(俗称博斯普鲁斯海峡和达达尼尔海峡)航行制度的变化,以及这些变化带来的。国际海事组织(IMO)解决争端的努力仅专注于海峡航行的技术方面,已成功避免了公开冲突和购买时间,但未能实现持久解决。在相信充分理解争端的各个方面对于消除争端至关重要的信念的驱使下,这项工作试图揭开最近关于海峡争端的技术,法律,经济和安全因素错综复杂的网络。为此,对海峡的航行和地缘政治形势进行了规划,然后对管理它们的现有国际法律制度的要素进行了审查和分析。特别注意了《海洋法公约》的含义及其对由长期国际公约管辖的用于国际航行的海峡的处理。提供了争端及其在IMO中的作用的详细提要,并对土耳其和IMO法规进行了审查,以确保它们与现有国际法保持一致。在详细阐述土耳其和国际海事组织监管工作的方式和范围时,这项工作确定了恢复1936年《蒙特勒公约》的完整性是成功弥合所有有关方面的安全,环境,经济和地缘政治利益的关键。建议采用一种程序框架,使《公约》的安全规定与当代的环境和航行安全法保持一致,而不会受到不适当的影响。

著录项

  • 作者

    Dyoulgerov, Milen Filipov.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Delaware.;

  • 授予单位 University of Delaware.;
  • 学科 Political Science International Law and Relations.; Transportation.; Political Science General.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2001
  • 页码 242 p.
  • 总页数 242
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 国际法;综合运输;政治理论;
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:46:44

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号