首页> 外文学位 >Understanding the responsible gambling behavior of non-problem gamblers
【24h】

Understanding the responsible gambling behavior of non-problem gamblers

机译:了解无问题赌徒的负责任赌博行为

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The purpose of this study was to better understand the goal-striving process in the context of non-problem gambler's responsible gambling. More specifically, the primary aim of this study was to elucidate the hierarchical structure of goals, the role of the motivational phase of the goal-striving process, and the influence of cognitive evaluation and affective regulation on the goal-striving process. In the first part of the study, a conceptual model is proposed, in which the intrinsic factors used to predict non-problem gamblers' intentions to gamble responsibly are delineated and tested according to the extension of the theory of planned behavior (Ajzen, 1985, 1991), the model of action phases (Gollwitzer, 1990, 1993), the model of goal-directed behavior (Perugini & Bagozzi, 2001; Perugini & Conner, 2000), and the model of effortful decision making and enactment (Bagozzi, Dholakia, & Basuroy, 2003; Dholakia, Bagozzi, & Gopinath, 2007). Four cognitive factors explain the motivational phase of the goal-striving process, and were incorporated in the current study. One factor explains the goal-oriented behavior at abstract level (i.e., goal feasibility), and the other three explain implementation of action-oriented behavior at concrete level (i.e., attitude toward implementing the actions necessary to achieve the goal, subjective norm, and perceived behavioral control). In addition, two ways of emotional regulation were incorporated to explain the goal-oriented behavior at abstract level. That is, prefactual emotional valence factors related to the success and failure of future goal attainment (anticipated positive and negative emotions) affect goal desire. To sum up, this study anticipated that the proposed antecedent constructs (two anticipated emotions, goal feasibility, attitude, subjective norm, and perceived behavioral control) were strong indicators of how non-problem casino patrons would strive to achieve the goal (i.e., maturing or developing responsible gambling behavior) through a goal-striving process, where the motivational phase plays a critical role in explaining intention to gamble responsibly.;A secondary goal of the study was to explore how responsible gambling strategies implemented by the gambling industry influence non-problem casino customers' goal-directed behavior in a responsible gambling setting. Given the ongoing controversy about the effectiveness of responsible gambling strategies, the focus in the second part of the current study was on how situational arousal factors (i.e., psychological reactance) with regard to external interventions (i.e., compulsory and supplementary responsible gambling strategies) would affect implementation intention, based on the psychological reactance theory (J. W. Brehm, 1989; S. S. Brehm & Brehm, 1981). In other words, situational arousal factors were incorporated herein to explain the extrinsic part of the goal-striving process model. This study was designed to facilitate an understanding of how and why external interventions may fail to deliver the intended effect in the responsible gambling context. In order to take into account the varying effectiveness of responsible gambling strategies, an effort was made to discern between the different effects of each responsible gambling strategy type and to understand in greater detail how these effects were moderated by individual disposition, and especially the strength of the individual's desire for control. A clear understanding of the moderating effect enables a richer understanding of the effectiveness of responsible gambling strategies with regard to responsible gambling behavior by non-problem casino patrons. Insight gained from the study through analysis of the results is discussed, and important theoretical and practical implications and future research agendas presented in the conclusion.
机译:这项研究的目的是为了更好地理解非问题赌徒负责任赌博的目标实现过程。更具体地说,本研究的主要目的是阐明目标的层次结构,目标实现过程的动机阶段的作用以及认知评估和情感调节对目标实现过程的影响。在研究的第一部分中,提出了一个概念模型,其中根据计划行为理论的扩展,描述和测试了用于预测无问题赌徒负责任地赌博意图的内在因素(Ajzen,1985; 1991年),行动阶段模型(Gollwitzer,1990年,1993年),目标行为模型(Perugini和Bagozzi,2001年; Perugini和Conner,2000年)以及努力决策和制定的模型(Bagozzi,Dholakia) ,&Basuroy,2003; Dholakia,Bagozzi,&Gopinath,2007)。四个认知因素解释了目标实现过程的动机阶段,这些因素已纳入本研究。一个因素在抽象级别上解释了面向目标的行为(即目标可行性),而其他三个因素在具体级别上解释了以行为为导向的行为的实现(即,对于实现目标,主观规范和感知的行为控制)。此外,两种情绪调节方式被纳入来解释抽象级目标导向行为。也就是说,与未来目标达成的成功和失败(预期的积极和消极情绪)相关的事前情绪效价因素会影响目标欲望。综上所述,这项研究预期拟议的前提构造(两种预期的情感,目标可行性,态度,主观规范和感知的行为控制)是非问题赌场顾客如何努力实现目标(即成熟)的有力指标。或通过制定目标实现过程来发展负责任的赌博行为,其中激励阶段在解释负责任地赌博的意图方面起着至关重要的作用。;研究的第二个目标是探索赌博业实施的负责任赌博策略如何影响非赌博行为。在负责任的赌博环境中问题赌场客户的目标导向行为。考虑到关于负责任赌博策略有效性的持续争议,本研究第二部分的重点是关于外部干预(即强制性和补充性负责任赌博策略)的情境唤醒因素(即心理反应)基于心理反应理论(JW Brehm,1989; SS Brehm&Brehm,1981)来影响实施意图。换句话说,情境唤醒因素被并入本文以解释目标达成过程模型的外在部分。这项研究旨在促进对外部干预如何以及为什么在负责任的赌博环境下无法发挥预期效果的理解。为了考虑负责任的赌博策略的不同效果,我们做出了努力来区分每种负责任的赌博策略类型的不同效果,并更详细地了解如何通过个人性格来缓解这些效果,尤其是个人的控制欲。对调节作用的清楚了解可以使人们更清楚地了解负责任赌博策略在非问题赌场顾客的负责任赌博行为方面的有效性。讨论了通过对结果进行分析而从研究中获得的见识,并在结论中提出了重要的理论和实践意义以及未来的研究议程。

著录项

  • 作者

    Lee, Jaeseok.;

  • 作者单位

    Temple University.;

  • 授予单位 Temple University.;
  • 学科 Business administration.;Marketing.;Recreation.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2016
  • 页码 205 p.
  • 总页数 205
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:46:36

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号