首页> 外文学位 >Flare pit hydrocarbon toxicity: Implications for soil assessment and remediation.
【24h】

Flare pit hydrocarbon toxicity: Implications for soil assessment and remediation.

机译:火炬坑碳氢化合物毒性:对土壤评估和修复的意义。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The toxicity of flare pit hydrocarbons was evaluated by two methods. First, the leachability and toxicity of water-soluble contamination from hydrocarbon contaminated flare pit soil was evaluated using a column leaching technique. Although soluble salts and metals in the flare pit soil were found to demonstrate some toxicity, the hydrocarbons within the flare pit soil were not toxic to bioassay organisms, nor were they leachable from the soil. Consequentially, the hydrocarbon contamination at the flare pit does not appear to be a serious ecotoxicological risk, on or off-site.; Secondly, the effective and intrinsic toxicity of extracted Hare pit hydrocarbons and crude oil hydrocarbons were evaluated. Several toxicity bioassays were used to evaluate the whole hydrocarbon mixtures, and saturate and aromatic fractions of the whole mixtures, in water and sod matrices. Gas chromatography determination of lethal body burdens in earthworm time was used to evaluate the intrinsic toxicity of the hydrocarbon mixtures. Both the flare and crude hydrocarbon mixtures were found to contain toxic hydrocarbon fractions; aromatic hydrocarbons were found to be more toxic than saturate hydrocarbons. The toxicity of the crude whole mixture was determined by the toxicity of the constituent saturate and aromatic fractions. However, the flare whole hydrocarbon mixture was much less bioavailable, and consequentially less toxic, than the crude whole mixture due the high concentration of aspaltene and polar compounds in the weathered flare pit hydrocarbon mixture. The difference in effective toxicity of the two whole mixtures has important implications for the use of chemically based soil guidelines for the assessment and remediation of hydrocarbon contaminated industrial sites. Some soil assessment and remediation guidelines currently in use are derived from tests of crude oil toxicity. The high toxicity of the crude hydrocarbon mixture may cause those guidelines to be very conservative when applied to weathered hydrocarbon contaminated sites high in asphaltene and polar compounds.
机译:火炬坑碳氢化合物的毒性通过两种方法进行评估。首先,使用柱浸技术评估了碳氢化合物污染的火炬坑土壤中水溶性污染物的浸出性和毒性。尽管发现火炬坑土壤中的可溶性盐和金属显示出一定的毒性,但火炬坑土壤中的碳氢化合物对生物测定生物无毒,也无法从土壤中浸出。因此,火炬坑内或场外的碳氢化合物污染似乎并不构成严重的生态毒理风险。其次,评估了提取的野兔碳氢化合物和原油碳氢化合物的有效和内在毒性。几种毒性生物测定法用于评估整个烃混合物以及在水和草皮基质中整个混合物的饱和和芳族部分。气相色谱法测定worm时间内的致命人体负担,以评估烃混合物的内在毒性。发现火炬和粗烃混合物均含有有毒的烃馏分。发现芳烃比饱和烃毒性更高。粗混合物的总毒性由饱和组分和芳族组分的毒性决定。然而,由于风化的火炬坑烃混合物中高浓度的天冬酰胺和极性化合物,火炬的整个烃混合物比粗的整个混合物具有更低的生物利用度,因此毒性也更低。两种混合物的有效毒性差异对使用化学基础的土壤准则评估和修复碳氢化合物污染的工业场所具有重要意义。当前使用的一些土壤评估和修复指南是从原油毒性测试中得出的。当将粗烃混合物的高毒性应用到沥青质和极性化合物含量高的风化烃污染场所时,这些准则可能会非常保守。

著录项

  • 作者

    Cook, Sonja Vandervaart.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Calgary (Canada).;

  • 授予单位 University of Calgary (Canada).;
  • 学科 Engineering Civil.; Engineering Environmental.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2002
  • 页码 312 p.
  • 总页数 312
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 建筑科学;环境污染及其防治;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号