首页> 外文学位 >A short treatise on Sports Antitrust Law: Why the Supreme Court of the United States should have granted the petition for writ of certiorari in Edward O'Bannon, Jr., et al. versus National Collegiate Athletic Association
【24h】

A short treatise on Sports Antitrust Law: Why the Supreme Court of the United States should have granted the petition for writ of certiorari in Edward O'Bannon, Jr., et al. versus National Collegiate Athletic Association

机译:关于体育反托拉斯法的简短论文:为什么美国最高法院应该在小爱德华·奥·班农(Edward O'Bannon,Jr.)等人的书面要求书上批准书状。与国家大学体育协会

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

By most accounts, intercollegiate sporting contests commenced in 1852 with a boat race between Yale and Harvard on Lake Winnipesaukee, New Hampshire (Reyburn, 2013). The first intercollegiate baseball game was played in 1859 between Amherst and Williams (Reyburn, 2013). The first college football game was between Rutgers and Princeton in 1869 (Gubi, 2011; Resvine, 2014). Since their inception, problems and issues arose with respect to safety, recruiting, compensation, sportsmanship, and commercialism. In response, the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) was formed in 1905 (originally Intercollegiate Athletic Association); over 111 years thereafter it still vehemently litigates concordant with its traditional and foundational amateurism model of collegiate sports. In October 2016, the Supreme Court denied review of O'Bannon v. NCAA: an antitrust case filed by former UCLA basketball star and 1995 Final Four MVP, Edward O'Bannon. Jr., and others, who petitioned seeking compensation for name, image and likeness rights which resulted in the first decision by a federal court to hold that NCAA amateur rules violated the Sherman Antitrust Act. This study examined the following: (1) the history and purpose of the NCAA as well as antitrust laws; (2) why the Supreme Court should have granted review of O'Bannon and how this will impact the current crisis and uncertainty with respect to the rights and responsibilities of the respective parties inclusive of the NCAA in its role in intercollegiate sports; (3) the relevant albeit discordant and balkanized federal court jurisprudence involving the NCAA, and (4) the policies, morality, and pragmatic considerations of the aforementioned issues, inclusive of amateurism, eligibility rules, and compensation of college athletes within the educational institution of higher learning.
机译:多数人认为,大学间体育竞赛始于1852年,当时耶鲁大学和哈佛大学在新罕布什尔州的温尼伯索基湖之间进行了划船比赛(Reyburn,2013年)。 1859年,阿默斯特(Amherst)和威廉姆斯(Williams)举行了首届大学间棒球比赛(Reyburn,2013)。 1869年,第一场大学橄榄球比赛是在罗格斯和普林斯顿之间进行的(Gubi,2011年; Resvine,2014年)。自成立以来,出现了与安全,征聘,薪酬,体育精神和商业主义有关的问题。作为回应,1905年成立了全国大学体育协会(NCAA)(最初是大学间体育协会)。在此之后的111年中,它仍然按照其传统和基础的大学体育业余模式大力提起诉讼。 2016年10月,最高法院否认对O'Bannon诉NCAA案的复审:前UCLA篮球明星和1995年最后四名MVP Edward O'Bannon提起的反托拉斯案。小和其他人,他们请求赔偿名称,图像和肖像权,这导致联邦法院首次裁定NCAA业余规则违反了《谢尔曼反托拉斯法》。这项研究检查了以下内容:(1)NCAA的历史和目的以及反托拉斯法; (2)最高法院为何应批准对O'Bannon的审查,以及这将如何影响当前的危机和不确定性,包括NCAA在各大学之间的体育运动中所涉各方的权利和责任; (3)涉及NCAA的相关不和谐和不公正的判例,以及(4)上述问题的政策,道德和务实考虑,包括业余精神,资格规则以及美国教育机构内大学运动员的薪酬高等学习。

著录项

  • 作者

    Kruse, William E.;

  • 作者单位

    United States Sports Academy.;

  • 授予单位 United States Sports Academy.;
  • 学科 Sports Management.
  • 学位 Ed.D.
  • 年度 2016
  • 页码 213 p.
  • 总页数 213
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:46:36

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号