首页> 外文学位 >The question of cultural autonomy: Reassessing the merits of cultural autonomy in the post-Cold War.
【24h】

The question of cultural autonomy: Reassessing the merits of cultural autonomy in the post-Cold War.

机译:文化自治问题:重新评估后冷战时期文化自治的优点。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Given the tendency of dominant powers to intervene on behalf of aggrieved groups when their hegemonic interests are at stake, it is important to assess the conditions under which the dominant powers of the international community should recognize an ethnic group's demand for cultural autonomy. Although severe economic oppression, ethnic cleansing, and genocide may warrant support for secession, cultural autonomy, if predicated on a specific criteria of human rights fairness, may prove a better long-term prospect for peace and stability. More specifically, it may help resolve conflicts over resource distribution and territorial boundaries and enable citizens to channel their demands to high political bodies.; This perception is also shared by Otto Bauer, a member of the Austrian Social Democratic Party (1899--1937), who proposed that cultural autonomy serve as concrete arrangement enabling citizens of all ethnic groups to administer their own cultural affairs. A contemporary and comparative analysis of his proposal will be applied to three case studies of regional ethnic conflict: Kosovo, Southeastern Turkey, and the Basque region in Spain. The main argument is structured around a social criteria consisting of four categories: (a) the type and degree and oppression of ethnic groups: (b) unequal social mobility (c) the interests of the main powers of the international community; (d) and the ethnic group's democratic control over their institutions.; Developed within an historical framework of three periods consisting of the Inter-War years (1919--1939), the Cold War (1945--1989) and post-Cold War eras (1989--to the present day), this dissertation assesses the merits of cultural autonomy vs. self-determination. The first period characterizes the League of Nations' failure to promote either of these approaches; the second, the prevalence of self-determination as a colonial right; and the third, the post-colonial ethnic conflict rooted in super-power rivalry. This historically guided analysis concludes with a consideration of the benefits of cultural autonomy in an era of globalization.
机译:鉴于当霸权主义利益受到威胁时,占主导地位的国家倾向于代表受屈的群体进行干预,因此,重要的是评估国际社会的占主导地位的国家应承认一个族裔群体对文化自治的要求的条件。尽管严重的经济压迫,种族清洗和种族灭绝可能需要分裂国家的支持,但如果以人权公正的特定标准为基础的文化自治,则可以证明和平与稳定的长期前景更好。更具体地说,它可以帮助解决资源分配和领土边界方面的冲突,并使公民能够将其要求传达给高级政治机构。奥地利社会民主党(1899--1937)成员奥托·鲍尔(Otto Bauer)也认同这种看法,他建议文化自治是使所有民族的公民都能管理自己的文化事务的具体安排。对他的建议进行的当代和比较分析将应用于三个区域种族冲突的案例研究:科索沃,土耳其东南部和西班牙的巴斯克地区。主要论点围绕着一个由四类组成的社会标准构成:(a)种族群体的类型,程度和压迫:(b)不平等的社会流动性(c)国际社会主要大国的利益; (d)种族群体对其机构的民主控制;本文是在三个时期的历史框架内发展起来的,其中包括战时时代(1919--1939年),冷战(1945--1989年)和冷战后时代(1989年至今)。文化自治与自决的优点。第一阶段的特点是国际联盟未能推广这两种方法中的任何一种。第二,自决作为殖民权利的普遍性;第三,后殖民时期的种族冲突源于超级大国之间的竞争。这项历史指导的分析总结了全球化时代文化自治的好处。

著录项

  • 作者

    Roach, Steven Craig.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Denver.;

  • 授予单位 University of Denver.;
  • 学科 Political Science International Law and Relations.; Sociology Ethnic and Racial Studies.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2002
  • 页码 213 p.
  • 总页数 213
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 国际法;民族学;
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:46:33

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号