首页> 外文学位 >Waste, wealth and public health: Recycling human excrement in the New England and mid-Atlantic states, 1820--1900.
【24h】

Waste, wealth and public health: Recycling human excrement in the New England and mid-Atlantic states, 1820--1900.

机译:浪费,财富和公共卫生:1820--1900年在新英格兰和大西洋中部州回收人类排泄物。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

An inquiry into the history of recycling human excrement, this dissertation explores the technological, social, political, economic and geographic aspects of the question. The study finds that many nineteenth-century Americans perceived recycling human excrement as a viable way to prevent environmental problems, it was a common practice in the New England and Mid-Atlantic states from 1820 to 1900, and a variety of recycling technologies were used which operated successfully in specific contexts. However, the construction of water-carriage sewers, the advent of the germ theory, political conflicts, the availability of commercial fertilizers, and the development of the global economy led to the decline of recycling.; Chapter One shows that the strongest advocates of recycling human excrement were agricultural public health reformers, who viewed it as a good way to solve the problems of soil exhaustion and excremental pollution. Chapter Two argues that agricultural reformers thought human excrement was a valuable fertilizer and that creating a complete cycle by returning human excrement to the soil was necessary in order to achieve permanent soil fertility.; In Chapter Three, this study claims that the rural privy/compost system was implemented voluntarily by many farmers because it integrated easily with their existing systems of manure management. Chapter Four looks at market gardening and poudrette production as systems that were designed to recycle urban excrement and argues that night soil fertilizers were popular among farmers. Chapter Five examines recycling as a public health issue in Baltimore, Philadelphia, New York City and Boston. Public health reformers in those cities promoted recycling because they believed it would prevent pollution, nuisances and disease. However, political conflicts often undermined their efforts to institute and improve recycling systems.; Chapter six analyzes the earth closet and the pneumatic system, two new recycling technologies that promised to make recycling more efficient while keeping excrement separate from greywater, storm water and industrial waste. Chapter seven focuses on broad irrigation, sub-surface irrigation, intermittent filtration and chemical precipitation, four technologies designed to recycle excrement mixed with wastewater. They were used in the eastern states to recycle the sewage of small towns, institutions, individual homes and factories.
机译:在对回收人类排泄物的历史进行探究之后,本论文探讨了该问题的技术,社会,政治,经济和地理方面。该研究发现,许多19世纪的美国人都认为回收人类排泄物是防止环境问题的可行方法,这是1820至1900年在新英格兰和大西洋中部各州的普遍做法,并且使用了各种回收技术,在特定情况下成功运行。然而,集水排污管道的建设,细菌理论的出现,政治冲突,商业肥料的可获得性以及全球经济的发展,导致了回收利用的减少。第一章表明,回收人类排泄物的最强有力的倡导者是农业公共卫生改革者,他们认为这是解决土壤枯竭和排泄物污染问题的好方法。第二章认为,农业改革家们认为人类排泄物是一种有价值的肥料,为了使土壤永久肥沃,有必要通过将人类排泄物返回土壤来形成一个完整的循环。在第三章中,这项研究声称农村私有/堆肥系统是许多农民自愿实施的,因为它很容易与他们现有的粪便管理系统整合。第四章将市场园艺和粉刺生产视为旨在回收城市粪便的系统,并指出夜间土壤肥料在农民中很流行。第五章探讨在巴尔的摩,费城,纽约和波士顿将回收作为公共卫生问题。这些城市的公共卫生改革者提倡回收,因为他们相信回收将防止污染,滋扰和疾病。但是,政治冲突常常破坏了他们建立和改善回收系统的努力。第六章分析了壁橱和气动系统,这两种新的回收技术有望提高回收效率,同时使粪便与灰水,雨水和工业废物分开。第七章重点介绍广泛的灌溉,地下灌溉,间歇性过滤和化学沉淀法,这四种技术旨在回收粪便和废水。它们在东部各州用于回收小镇,机构,个人住宅和工厂的污水。

著录项

  • 作者

    Stupski, Karen Benay.;

  • 作者单位

    The Johns Hopkins University.;

  • 授予单位 The Johns Hopkins University.;
  • 学科 History of Science.; History United States.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2002
  • 页码 426 p.
  • 总页数 426
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 N09;K7;
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:46:34

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号