首页> 外文学位 >Can we assess risk for violence in women? Predictive accuracy of the HCR-20.
【24h】

Can we assess risk for violence in women? Predictive accuracy of the HCR-20.

机译:我们可以评估女性遭受暴力侵害的风险吗? HCR-20的预测精度。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

"Violence risk assessments" are used routinely in forensic settings, in decisions about psychiatric admission and release, as well as choices about mental health treatment. Structured professional judgment (SPJ) techniques such as the HCR-20 Violence Risk Assessment Scheme (HCR-20, Webster, Douglas, Eaves, & Hart, 1997) represent improvement over unstructured methods in a range of settings and populations. However, whether the HCR-20, which was primarily validated in men, is valid in women is unclear from the existing research.;This study utilized data from the MacArthur Study of Mental Disorder and Violence to score the HCR-20 for each participant (N = 836). Accuracy of each of the scales (i.e., H, C, and HC) in predicting violent outcome was evaluated for the entire sample at two time points (20 weeks and 50 weeks). This study compared predictive accuracy for men and women for each of the HC scales and each HC item, at each time point. Additionally, mean scores on each of the HC scale and HC item scores were compared for men and women.;The combined HC score yielded moderate predictive accuracy in both the short and long-term in the sample as a whole. The HC score did not differ in predictive accuracy for men and women in either the short or the long-term; however, the predictive accuracy in women in the short-term was poor. The predictive accuracy of the H scale was significantly better for men as compared to women in the short-term, and approached significance in the long-term. None of the individual HC items differed in predictive accuracy between men and women; however, there were significant score differences between men and women on the majority of the items.;This study offers limited support for the HCR-20 in a civil psychiatric sample. Results suggest that the HCR-20 is slightly better for evaluating risk for future violence in men than in women. Results do not suggest that the measure needs to be altered for women, or should not be used on women. However, results of the HCR-20 need be interpreted with more caution in women than in men, even if still valid.
机译:“暴力风险评估”通常用于法医环境,有关精神科住院和放疗的决定以及有关心理健康治疗的选择。诸如HCR-20暴力风险评估计划(HCR-20,Webster,Douglas,Eaves和Hart,1997)之类的结构化专业判断(SPJ)技术在一定范围和人群中代表了非结构化方法的改进。然而,现有研究尚不清楚主要在男性中验证的HCR-20是否在女性中有效。;该研究利用麦克阿瑟精神障碍与暴力研究的数据对每个参与者的HCR-20进行评分( N = 836)。在两个时间点(20周和50周)对整个样本评估了预测暴力结果的每种量表(即H,C和HC)的准确性。这项研究比较了每个时间点每个HC量表和每个HC项目的男性和女性的预测准确性。此外,还比较了男性和女性在HC量表和HC项目得分上的平均得分。总体而言,合并的HC得分在短期和长期内均产生中等预测准确性。无论是短期还是长期,HC分数在男性和女性的预测准确性上均无差异。但是,短期内女性的预测准确性较差。 H量表的预测准确性在短期内与女性相比明显好于男性,而从长期来看,其意义显着。男性和女性的个人HC项目的预测准确性均无差异。但是,在大多数项目上,男女得分存在显着差异。这项研究在民间精神病学样本中对HCR-20的支持有限。结果表明,HCR-20在评估男性未来暴力风险方面比女性要好一些。结果并不表明该措施需要针对女性而改变,或者不应该用于女性。但是,女性比男性更谨慎地解释HCR-20的结果,即使仍然有效。

著录项

  • 作者单位

    Fordham University.;

  • 授予单位 Fordham University.;
  • 学科 Law.;Womens Studies.;Psychology Clinical.;Psychology Psychometrics.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2010
  • 页码 158 p.
  • 总页数 158
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号