首页> 外文学位 >Examination of high school adolescent discourse during Individualized Education Program (IEP) meetings through the lens of self-determination.
【24h】

Examination of high school adolescent discourse during Individualized Education Program (IEP) meetings through the lens of self-determination.

机译:通过自决的眼光,在个性化教育计划(IEP)会议期间检查高中青少年的话语。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Research suggests that adolescent students classified as learning disabled benefit from participating in their IEP meetings; however, when the students are present, they are silent and passive attendees. As in the ethnographic study conducted by R. Rogers, this researcher has attended IEP meetings, listened to the students, and documented their talk so the students can be heard.;The purposes of this hypothesis generating study were to examine the high school students' knowledge about their roles in IEP meetings both prior to and after their IEP meetings, to document the manner in which students participated during IEP meetings, and to examine the relationship between the students' behaviors during the meetings and their scores on the Arc's Self-Determination Scale using the students' discourse. To fulfill these purposes, data were collected via audiotapes of student interviews and IEP meetings, questionnaires completed by IEP team members, and field notes taken by an observer during the IEP meetings. An analysis of the transcriptions of the interviews and meetings, the questionnaires, and the field notes was presented as four mini-case studies which documented the discourse of all the participants of the IEP meetings with a focus on what the students say.;The following hypotheses are based on an analysis of the data: (1) Adolescent students classified as learning disabled exhibit limited participation and few behaviors associated with self-determination during their IEP meetings. (2) The relationship between the score achieved by the adolescent student classified as learning disabled on the Arc's Self-Determination Scale and his or her behavior at an IEP meeting is inconsistent. (3) Alternative procedures for conducting IEP reviews may prove to be sites in which greater self-determination skills are evidenced. The current content and process of an annual meeting to review the IEP document inhibits the participation of both the student and the parents. Educators need to realign the focal point of IEP meetings and listen. The importance and uniqueness of this study is that the students' voices are presented clearly and distinctly for all to hear.
机译:研究表明,被归类为学习障碍的青少年学生将从参加IEP会议中受益。但是,当学生在场时,他们是沉默且被动的参与者。正如R.Rogers进行的人种学研究一样,该研究人员参加了IEP会议,听取了学生的意见,并记录了他们的谈话内容,以便可以听到学生的声音。了解他们在IEP会议之前和之后在IEP会议中的角色,记录学生参加IEP会议的方式,并检查学生在会议期间的行为与他们在Arc自我决定中得分之间的关​​系利用学生的话语进行扩展。为了实现这些目的,通过学生访谈和IEP会议的录音带,IEP团队成员填写的调查表以及IEP会议期间观察员的现场笔记来收集数据。访谈和会议,问卷调查表和现场笔记的抄录分析以四个小型案例研究的形式呈现,这些案例记录了IEP会议所有参与者的论述,并着重于学生所说的话。假设基于对数据的分析:(1)被归类为学习障碍的青少年学生在IEP会议上表现出有限的参与和与自决有关的行为。 (2)在Arc的自我决定量表中,被归类为学习障碍的青少年学生所获得的分数与他或她在IEP会议上的行为之间的关系是不一致的。 (3)进行IEP评审的替代程序可能被证明是具有更高的自决技能的场所。审查IEP文件的年度会议的当前内容和流程阻碍了学生和家长的参与。教育者需要重新调整IEP会议的焦点并倾听。这项研究的重要性和独特性在于,学生的声音清晰清晰地呈现给所有人听。

著录项

  • 作者

    Staab, Patricia Louise.;

  • 作者单位

    Fordham University.;

  • 授予单位 Fordham University.;
  • 学科 Education Special.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2010
  • 页码 302 p.
  • 总页数 302
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:36:43

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号