首页> 外文学位 >Defending an essentialist ontology of kinds, laws, and biological taxa.
【24h】

Defending an essentialist ontology of kinds, laws, and biological taxa.

机译:捍卫物种,法律和生物分类的本质论本体。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Natural-kind essentialism is the view that the physical world is populated by objects belonging to distinct natural kinds, kinds whose essences function as the criteria for kind-membership and provide the intrinsic grounds for the behaviour of their individual members. A prominent school of thought in recent metaphysics and philosophy of science, it nevertheless faces a number of challenges. My principal aim in this dissertation is to rectify this state of affairs, placing the theory on firmer ground and clarifying some of its central tenets.;The work is divided up topically, with chapters two and three addressing some worries for the essentialist ontology of kinds, while chapters four and five deal with laws, and chapter six with biological taxa: Chatper (2) "Natural Kinds and the Problem of Complex Essences". Here I attempt to address the question of how it is that an instantiated kind-essence can be unified while also consisting at least in part of inherently separable properties. What exactly accounts for the unity of a kind-essence? Chapter (3) "Property Primitivism and the Reducibility of Natural Kinds". This section deals with the question of whether 'natural kind' is a required and irreducible category in ontology, or if instead what we think of as kinds are really just aggregates of properties. Chapter (4) "Complex Essences and the Ontology of Laws". I attempt to defend the essentialist view of laws, making use of some of the points raised in chapter two concerning the complexity of essences. More specifically, I argue that there are certain objections faced both by essentialism and by a major rival, the Dretske-Tooley-Armstrong (DTA) theory of laws, and that essentialism can be shown to address these objections more effectively. Chapter (5) "Does Essentialism Allow for Nomic Realism?" I review the conflicting answers to this question and conclude that essentialists can maintain that laws are a real ingredient in ontology, but that doing so requires making some additions to the standard essentialist catalogue of beings. Chapter (6) "In Defense of Biological Essentialism" I turn my attention to the question of whether species have kind-essences consisting at least in part of intrinsic properties.
机译:自然类型的本质主义认为,物理世界由属于不同自然物种的物体组成,这些物体的本质起着作为成员资格的标准的作用,并为其个体成员的行为提供了内在基础。它是近来形而上学和科学哲学的著名思想流派,但仍面临许多挑战。本论文的主要目的是纠正这种状况,将理论置于更牢固的基础上,并阐明其中心思想。论文分为两部分,第二章和第三章解决了对本质论本体的种种担忧。 ,而第四章和第五章讨论法律,第六章讨论生物分类单元:Chatper(2)“自然种类和复杂本质问题”。在这里,我尝试解决一个问题,即实例化的本质可以如何统一,同时还至少部分包含固有可分离的属性。什么才是善良统一的原因?第三章“财产原始主义与自然种类的可还原性”。本节讨论的问题是,“自然种类”是本体中必不可少的且不可简化的类别,还是我们认为的种类实际上只是属性的集合。第4章“复杂的本质与法律本体论”。我试图利用第二章中关于本质复杂性的观点捍卫法律的本质主义观点。更具体地说,我认为,本质主义和主要竞争对手德雷茨克-奥托伊-阿姆斯特朗(DTA)法学理论都面临某些反对意见,并且事实证明,本质主义可以更有效地解决这些反对意见。第5章“本质主义是否允许名义上的现实主义?”我回顾了这个问题的矛盾答案,并得出结论,本质主义者可以坚持认为法律是本体论中的真正成分,但是要做到这一点,就需要对标准的本质主义者目录进行补充。第(6)章“捍卫生物本质主义”我将注意力转向一个问题,即物种是否具有至少部分由内在特性构成的种类。

著录项

  • 作者

    Dumsday, Travis.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Calgary (Canada).;

  • 授予单位 University of Calgary (Canada).;
  • 学科 Religion Philosophy of.;Philosophy.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2010
  • 页码 188 p.
  • 总页数 188
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:37:28

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号