首页> 外文学位 >Integrating environmental equity, energy and sustainability: A spatial-temporal study of electric power generation.
【24h】

Integrating environmental equity, energy and sustainability: A spatial-temporal study of electric power generation.

机译:整合环境公平,能源和可持续性:发电的时空研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The theoretical scope of this dissertation encompasses the ecological factors of equity and energy. Literature important to environmental justice and sustainability are reviewed, and a general integration of global concepts is delineated. The conceptual framework includes ecological integrity, quality human development, intra- and inter-generational equity and risk originating from human economic activity and modern energy production. The empirical focus of this study concentrates on environmental equity and electric power generation within the United States. Several designs are employed while using paired t-tests, independent t-tests, zero-order correlation coefficients and regression coefficients to test seven sets of hypotheses. Examinations are conducted at the census tract level within Texas and at the state level across the United States. At the community level within Texas, communities that host coal or natural gas utility power plants and corresponding comparison communities that do not host such power plants are tested for compositional differences. Comparisons are made both before and after the power plants began operating for purposes of assessing outcomes of the siting process and impacts of the power plants. Relationships between the compositions of the hosting communities and the risks and benefits originating from the observed power plants are also examined. At the statewide level across the United States, relationships between statewide composition variables and risks and benefits originating from statewide electric power generation are examined. Findings indicate the existence of some limited environmental inequities, but they do not indicate disparities that confirm the general thesis of environmental racism put forth by environmental justice advocates. Although environmental justice strategies that would utilize Title VI of the 1964 Civil Rights Act and the disparate impact standard do not appear to be applicable, some findings suggest potential inequities in institutional practices involving environmental compliance, monitoring and enforcement that are hardly justifiable within the context of market dynamics.
机译:本文的理论范围包括公平和能源的生态因素。审查了对环境正义和可持续性重要的文献,并描述了全球概念的一般融合。概念框架包括生态完整性,人类的优质发展,代际和代际公平以及源自人类经济活动和现代能源生产的风险。这项研究的经验重点集中在美国内部的环境公平性和发电方面。在使用配对t检验,独立t检验,零阶相关系数和回归系数来检验七组假设时,采用了几种设计。考试在得克萨斯州和美国全州的州一级进行。在得克萨斯州的社区级别,将对托管煤炭或天然气公用事业发电厂的社区以及未托管此类发电厂的相应比较社区进行成分差异测试。为了评估选址过程的结果和电厂的影响,在电厂开始运营之前和之后进行了比较。还检查了收容社区的组成与观察到的电厂所产生的风险和收益之间的关系。在美国全州范围内,检查了州范围组成变量与源自州范围发电的风险和收益之间的关系。调查结果表明存在一些有限的环境不平等现象,但并未表明可以证实环境正义倡导者提出的环境种族主义总论的差距。虽然利用1964年《民权法案》第六章和不同影响标准的环境司法策略似乎不适用,但一些调查结果表明,在涉及环境合规,监测和执法的制度实践中存在潜在的不平等现象,在以下情况下几乎是不合理的:市场动态。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号