首页> 外文学位 >Choosing Europe: The Maastricht Treaty in the British and French public discourse. A theory of the relationship between the press, public opinion, and policy.
【24h】

Choosing Europe: The Maastricht Treaty in the British and French public discourse. A theory of the relationship between the press, public opinion, and policy.

机译:选择欧洲:英法两国公共话语中的《马斯特里赫特条约》。关于新闻,舆论和政策之间关系的理论。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This dissertation focuses on the political influence of the press, and on the role of French and British nationalisms on the formation of policy agenda in the particular case of the Maastricht Treaty. It also examines the influence of the public opinion on the policy agenda and tries to answer the following questions: is the European integration indeed undermining the nation state, and is the public accepting this process? Did the press report a selective agenda regarding the Maastricht Treaty in France and Britain? How did the press reporting influence public opinion regarding the treaty in France and Britain?;This is a comparative study of France and Britain, two main players in the European Union, which define their position to the EU in almost opposite terms. The French considered their country part of Europe, while the British saw Europe as "The Other." Both France and Britain expressed concern that the transnational power of decision of the EU weakened their national sovereignty, which they defined differently. It is argued that in France and Britain the processes of economic integration have actually intensified the national feelings and the attachment to one's nation.;The interaction between the press, opinion, and policy in Great Britain and France is studied in an interdisciplinary framework with the help of two theories: one is a political theory: nationalism; the other is a communication theory: agenda setting.;Agenda setting is used as an instrument of measurement of public attitudes, in this case, the attachment of the French and British to their national identity and their definition of these concepts. Agenda setting is also used as a political process when correlated with other historical sources---such as speeches by politicians and presidents, autobiographies, political writings of the members of the intellectual elite, and secondary sources on the issues of national identity and European integration. This analysis shows how newspapers in France and Britain were part of the process of European integration, and how they influenced it.
机译:本文着眼于新闻界的政治影响,以及法国和英国民族主义在《马斯特里赫特条约》的特殊情况下在政策议程形成中的作用。它还研究了舆论对政策议程的影响,并试图回答以下问题:欧洲一体化是否确实在破坏民族国家,公众是否接受这一进程?媒体是否报道了有关法国和英国《马斯特里赫特条约》的选择性议程?新闻报道如何影响有关法国和英国条约的公众舆论?;这是对法国和英国的比较研究,法国和英国是欧盟的两个主要参与者,它们以几乎相反的方式定义了它们在欧盟中的地位。法国人把他们的国家视为欧洲的一部分,而英国人则把欧洲视为“另一国”。法国和英国都对欧盟的跨国决策权削弱了其定义不同的国家主权表示关注。有人认为,在法国和英国,经济一体化进程实际上增强了民族感情和对一个国家的依恋。;在英国和法国的新闻,舆论和政策之间的相互作用是通过跨学科框架研究的。两种理论的帮助:一种是政治理论:民族主义;另一种是交流理论:议程设置。议程设置被用作衡量公众态度的一种工具,在这种情况下,法国和英国人对他们的民族认同和对这些概念的定义受到重视。与其他历史渊源相关联时,议程设置也被用作政治过程,例如政客和总统的讲话,自传,知识分子精英的政治著作以及有关民族认同和欧洲一体化问题的次要资源。该分析显示了法国和英国的报纸如何成为欧洲一体化进程的一部分,以及它们如何影响欧洲一体化。

著录项

  • 作者

    Buzan, Angela Ligia.;

  • 作者单位

    Boston University.;

  • 授予单位 Boston University.;
  • 学科 Political science.;Mass communication.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2002
  • 页码 252 p.
  • 总页数 252
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:46:14

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号