首页> 外文学位 >Writing modernist and avant-garde music in Mexico: Performativity, transculturation and identity after the Revolution, 1920--1930 (Julian Carrillo, Carlos Chavez, Manuel M. Ponce).
【24h】

Writing modernist and avant-garde music in Mexico: Performativity, transculturation and identity after the Revolution, 1920--1930 (Julian Carrillo, Carlos Chavez, Manuel M. Ponce).

机译:在墨西哥写作现代主义和前卫音乐:革命后1920--1930年的表演性,跨文化和身份认同(朱利安·卡里略,卡洛斯·查韦斯,曼努埃尔·庞塞)。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

In my dissertation I study the traditional rhetoric of Mexican cultural history that interprets post-revolutionary artistic manifestations as a "natural," almost teleological outcome of the Mexican Revolution. As with every historical narrative, this revolutionary hegemonic discourse developed out of a "myth of origin" which homologated the identity of the nation with the ideology of the new state. As part of this process, the modernist and avant-garde works of Julian Carrillo (1875--1965), Carlos Chavez (1899--1978), and Manuel M. Ponce (1882--1948) were written into the "official" discourse of the Mexican Revolution by adjusting them (as imitation of European styles, and nationalist and proto-nationalist musics respectively) to its ideological requirements. I propose an alternative reading that recognizes the complex social and cultural construction of that ideology and the uncertainties created by this process. To study these events I develop a model of identity construction that emphasizes agency and choice as individual action within changing ideologies. Under this paradigm, I analyze the artistic activities of Carrillo, Chavez, and Ponce in the 1920s as the result of individual action confronting power and struggling for hegemony, and consider their musical styles as sites of individual ideological struggle.; My work re-enacts a double performative exercise. First, the composers' self-representation and identification through musical style, and second, the composer's role in the construction and execution of a hegemonic discourse that re-wrote them a posteriori, according to the nationalist principles of the dominant regime.
机译:在我的论文中,我研究了墨西哥文化历史的传统修辞学,该修辞学将革命后的艺术表现形式解释为墨西哥革命的“自然的”,几乎是目的论的结果。如同所有历史叙事一样,这种革命性的霸权话语是从“起源神话”发展而来的,该起源使国家的身份与新国家的意识形态相呼应。作为此过程的一部分,朱利安·卡里略(1875--1965),卡洛斯·查韦斯(1899--1978)和曼努埃尔·庞塞(1882--1948)的现代主义和前卫作品被写入“官方”页面通过调整墨西哥革命的话语(分别模仿欧洲风格以及民族主义和原始民族主义音乐)使其适应意识形态要求。我提出了另一种读物,该读物认识到该意识形态的复杂的社会和文化建构以及这一过程带来的不确定性。为了研究这些事件,我建立了一种身份建构模型,该模型强调代理和选择作为不断变化的意识形态中的个人行为。在这种范式下,我分析了卡里略,查韦斯和庞塞在1920年代的艺术活动,这些活动是个人行动面对权力和争夺霸权的结果,并将其音乐风格视为个人思想斗争的场所。我的工作重新演绎了两次表演。首先,根据作曲家的民族主义原则,作曲家的自我表现和通过音乐风格的认同,其次,作曲家在霸权话语的建构和执行中的作用,使他们改写了后代。

著录项

  • 作者单位

    The Ohio State University.;

  • 授予单位 The Ohio State University.;
  • 学科 Music.; History Latin American.; Fine Arts.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2003
  • 页码 254 p.
  • 总页数 254
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 音乐;拉丁美洲;艺术;
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:45:57

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号